DKRW coal-to-gasoline project gets a new, longer timetable

2013-12-19T07:00:00Z 2013-12-19T21:25:04Z DKRW coal-to-gasoline project gets a new, longer timetableBy LAURA HANCOCK Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

SARATOGA — The Wyoming Industrial Siting Council approved a new time line for a long-delayed, high-tech coal conversion project in Carbon County on Wednesday, which could delay the project’s construction by more than three years.

A new condition to the permit for the $2 billion DKRW Advanced Fuels coal-to-gasoline project: The company must regularly update surrounding communities about progress on the project, including through twice-a-year public meetings.

The plant would turn local coal into 87-octane gasoline, liquefied petroleum gas products of propane and butane, carbon for enhanced oil recovery and sulfur for chemical and fertilizer production.

The seven-member council, which by state law is in charge of permitting construction projects that cost $190.8 million or more, first granted Houston-based DKRW the construction permit in 2008. Aside from some light construction, the project hasn’t moved forward.

On Wednesday, the council debated for more than an hour on a DKRW proposal asking for an additional 30 months before the company would have to submit documents such as a construction schedule, a housing plan for workers, and a description of manpower demands over time. DKRW’s proposal contained a provision that if it doesn’t present those documents within 30 months, the state can yank the permit. After an initial vote in which a majority of council members rejected DKRW’s proposal, the council rewrote the proposal to make it more concise, and a majority approved it.

Council members added additional requirements to the proposal, including a demand that DKRW communicate quarterly with nearby communities such as Medicine Bow about the project’s progress and a public hearing every six months that is advertised and announced in local newspapers, to enlighten the public on the project’s progress.

As for the documents the company must submit, they have to be in the Industrial Siting Council’s hands nine months before construction resumes. That could mean folks in Carbon County may have to wait 39 months before construction is in full swing.

Community members were mixed about their support of the project. Medicine Bow Council President Kenda Colman said her town supported the project. She had a handful of Medicine Bow residents stand during the meeting. She said the town was making water and sewer upgrades to accommodate the influx of workers. The company estimated in documents provided to the council that there will be about 2,300 construction jobs and 435 permanent operations jobs.

“We wanted to let you know we feel this is a good group to work with,” Colman said.


Carbon County Commissioner Sue Jones said the project may be too big and complex ever to come to fruition.

“I believe we may be parties to one of the longest-running scams worldwide,” she said.

Wade Cline, DKRW executive vice president and general counsel, said that there are two main reasons for the delays: financing and contractors.

Financing has been complicated and got derailed after the banking crisis of 2008. About 65 percent of project will be paid for with financing from banks, Cline said, with the remaining 35 percent coming from equity from investors.

Cline said the company is trying to line up dozens of subcontractors to provide materials and workers — from electrical and plumbing to road and site construction. Once they have better details of the subcontractors for the project, they can present that information to the banks, which require it for such a project, Cline said.

Wyoming Industrial Siting Council member Richard O’Gara of Cheyenne voted against the new timetable both times it came up for vote. He wanted to discuss whether DKRW had been out of compliance with its 2008 permit, since the company had not provided the update that the council expected earlier this year.

But DKRW attorney Mary Throne objected, saying that such a discussion would require a formal hearing and legal briefs by the state and DKRW. Throne said she was confident that DKRW was never out of compliance.

Justin Daraie, a lawyer from the state Attorney General’s Office working on behalf of the Industrial Siting Council, declined to say whether there would be a compliance hearing in the future.

Council member Sandy Shuptrine of Jackson also voted against the permit both times, saying that “it opens the door for other applicants to make their own rules.”

“The precedent really disturbs and bothers me,” she said.

Reach state reporter Laura Hancock at 307-266-0581 or at Follow her on Twitter: @laurahancock.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. Cody Coyote
    Report Abuse
    Cody Coyote - December 19, 2013 12:11 pm
    It's long past the time that this Enron-DKRW project had its plug pulled. That it did not this time around in the face of the proposal is all the evidence you need to see how corrupt the energy industry regulators in Wyoming have become, at the behest of their handlers at the Statehouse.

    Somewhere, a lobbyist dined on a 32-ounce cattleman's cut steak last night...

    P.S. the Fischer-Tropf process that this coal-to-liquid scheme is based on was first used in South Africa in 1927.
  2. jackel
    Report Abuse
    jackel - December 19, 2013 9:59 am
    After listening to the news and reading the article, I would have to say the WDEQ has once again played politics, not the intentions of the office. When the Industrial siting Committee asked if the DKRW company was in complaince they failed Wyoming. It was obivious by the reporting the WDEQ had written DKRW with a non- compliance letter in November, yet would take no position on their own rules. Then failed the committee by not standing by their letter.
    What a waste of time, for it was staged not on the people of Wyoming, or Carbon County. The same excuses were repeated, awaiting financing, and when questioned about piping and additional permits same answers, just a different time period.
    Giving up the construction permit in 30 months is an easy way of getting out of 10years and 6 months of speculations. It was mentioned giving up 160million dollar investment, really how much have they made on speculations and investors since the permit was issued? Well Carbon County and Medicine Bow good luck for the dreams of fresh new economy awaits 30 more months and you've been in sleepy hollow of DKRW's road apples.
  3. proteus
    Report Abuse
    proteus - December 19, 2013 8:09 am
    I feel sorry for the communities that are being led by the "carrot" of economic development that will likely never come...if this supposed plant would actually make anyone money it would be built already. At least Ms. Jones can see through the BS; there is hope yet.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick