Encana aims to dispose of wastewater in Madison aquifer

2013-02-21T22:00:00Z 2013-05-14T21:11:38Z Encana aims to dispose of wastewater in Madison aquiferBy ADAM VOGE Star-Tribune energy reporter Casper Star-Tribune Online
February 21, 2013 10:00 pm  • 

Wyoming's environmental regulatory agency is objecting to an oil and natural gas company's plan to inject wastewater into a Wyoming aquifer.

The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality in a Feb. 11 letter opposed a plan by Encana Oil and Gas to pump water from its oil and gas wells deep into the Madison geological formation.

Encana, a Calgary, Alberta-based producer with a major active project south of Pinedale, is seeking permission from the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission for a disposal well located in Encana's Moneta Divide project area about 60 miles west of Casper.

Under the company's plan, water produced from approximately 280 existing oil and gas wells would be injected into the aquifer about 15,000 feet below the ground, far deeper than most water wells.

But the DEQ won't back the plan, saying the water in the formation produces drinking water elsewhere in the state, and is therefore an important potential water source.

"Clearly, future potential use of the Madison in the area of development is within the realm of possibility," wrote James O'Connor, a DEQ geologist. O'Connor added that the water is of similar quality to water being piped into Gillette from 40 miles away, also from the Madison formation.

Despite its use as a drinking water source elsewhere in the state, Encana officials say there's little chance the water below the Moneta Divide could be practically obtained and potable for end users.

"Where we are proposing to inject is extremely deep and the water quality in this part of the formation is poor," Paul Ulrich, the company's project lead for the Moneta Divide, said in an interview. "It would be extremely expensive for anybody to produce this water for residential or domestic use."

Ulrich said the water's total dissolved solids content, a measure that gauges tiny organic and inorganic matter in water, has tested at around 1,000 milligrams per liter of water. The EPA recommends drinking only water below 500 milligrams of dissolved solids per liter.

Ulrich added that tests also showed the underground water exceeds standards for potentially harmful naturally-occurring substances like radium, arsenic, lead and mercury.

"The overall water quality of the water in the Madison would require significant treatment to make it potable," he said. "That is part of our submission."

Encana has said in statements to the oil and gas commission that the water is far too deep for a typical water well, meaning it would be costly to retrieve the water. And because the water under the Moneta is far from towns or cities -- about 40 miles from Riverton -- Ulrich said the cost to obtain the water would also have to include funds to transport it.

"It would be impractical for Riverton or Lander or Shoshoni’s needs, even 50 or 100 years from now," he said.

 A company official said Thursday Encana isn't certain how the well would factor into a plan -- currently under regulatory review -- to expand the field.

Members of a Wyoming landowners group say they're investigating the disposal request.

"We are generally concerned about it, and are looking into it because we’re concerned any time a drinking water aquifer could be exempted," said Jill Morrison, an organizer with the Powder River Basin Resource Council. "It seems right now the DEQ and [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency] have the public’s interest at the forefront."

The company had planned to appear before the commission earlier this month to state its case, but asked for a continuance until March after the DEQ's and EPA's responses to the plan.

The EPA, also asked by the commission to weigh in on the proposal, offered no judgment but did ask several questions about regional geology and water wells. The agency also asked why two neighboring formations, the Tensleep and Nugget, couldn't be used as a target zone. Ulrich said Thursday the company doesn't think either of the two would be able to handle injection.

Ulrich said Encana is working to respond to the EPA's and DEQ's other questions and concerns. The matter is tentatively on the commission's March agenda.

"We’ve met the requirement for a technical and economic exemption for this aquifer," he said. "We’re confident over the next couple of weeks, in discussion with the EPA and DEQ, that we’ll be able to address the issues that they’ve brought up to their satisfaction."

Reach energy reporter Adam Voge at 307-266-0561, or at adam.voge@trib.com. Read his blog at http://trib.com/news/opinion/blogs/boom or follow him on Twitter @vogeCST.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(10) Comments

  1. supercalifragilistic
    Report Abuse
    supercalifragilistic - April 06, 2013 8:19 am
    Fracturing wells only travel as much as 200 to 300 feet tops.
    When you're 12,000 feet down and your water table is at 350 feet, well you do the math.
    The problem with enviros is, their philosophical values align in coordination with the (commercial) with the Capital One Baby and Jimmy Falon, always stuck on "no" as an answer.
  2. DukeONuke
    Report Abuse
    DukeONuke - April 05, 2013 11:01 pm
    PS - Rawhide should also be force feed Encana waste water. Enjoy Rawhide.
  3. DukeONuke
    Report Abuse
    DukeONuke - April 05, 2013 7:18 pm
    Bottle the waste water and force the Chief Officers and Top Management of Encana to drink it. Let their kidneys purify the waste water before it is released as urine into local waste water treatment facility's which will then further purify their kidney processed waste. This is the only PERFECT solution.

    Obviously Encana masterminds have been experimenting with hallucinogens to have come up with this kind of hair brained solution to getting rid of their waste. So I would then conclude that they should totally be on board with my above proposed solution.

    The Duke
  4. Wyomingsportsman
    Report Abuse
    Wyomingsportsman - February 22, 2013 12:08 pm
    Cities east of here use the Madison for their water supply. Rapid City gets their entire water supply out of the Madison. Why in the world would you want to inject any waste water into such a huge aquifer. I used to think Encana was responsible, but I have now changed my opinion.
  5. Pops
    Report Abuse
    Pops - February 22, 2013 9:54 am
    If It reads kinda-sorta like a bad idea, you know it's gotta be a seriously harmful plan. The investors are too invested and selfish to trust with this type of environmental projection. Keep looking into this issue and support a cautious vigilant approach.
  6. Big Evan Diehl
    Report Abuse
    Big Evan Diehl - February 22, 2013 9:29 am
    It's incredible that Encana would try to get away with this. The Madison formation outcrops all over northwest Wyoming. In other words, it's 15,000' feet down here, and then a few miles over you're looking at it on the surface. And the water in it travels.

    Encana should go back to Canada.
  7. brianvmax
    Report Abuse
    brianvmax - February 22, 2013 8:23 am
    you are correct, but these same people see no problem buying bottled water by the cases and throwing the plastic in landfills.
  8. Rawhide
    Report Abuse
    Rawhide - February 22, 2013 6:29 am
    Remember your water come from a depth of 500 feet or less...they are injecting at 15000 ft...quit listening to all the greenie hype...
  9. Rawhide
    Report Abuse
    Rawhide - February 22, 2013 6:25 am
    And we now hear from another fool that didn't get the facts...it's injected way below the water table in abandoned oil/ gas wells...geeez.....
  10. oilpatchwife
    Report Abuse
    oilpatchwife - February 21, 2013 10:57 pm
    This is NOT a good idea!!!! WE drink the water from the Madison Formation. The animals we EAT drink the water from the Madison Formation. The waste water ENCANA wants to inject in to OUR drinking water is not palatable in ANY form what so ever by any living thing and they want to put it in OUR water? No! Do NOT allow this to happen. If ENCANA prevails with this plan, we will never be able to recover the water quality. EVER! I've been involved in oil and gas production for forever. I know this is a bad situation and will RUIN our water.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick