Environmental groups: Halt new Powder River Basin coal mining

2013-04-15T21:00:00Z 2013-08-20T18:41:08Z Environmental groups: Halt new Powder River Basin coal miningBy ADAM VOGE Star-Tribune energy reporter Casper Star-Tribune Online

New U.S. Interior Secretary Sally Jewell received a Wyoming-centric letter on Monday, her first day overseeing federal lands.

Environmental groups, including Wyoming's own Powder River Basin Resource Council, implored the new secretary in a mass letter to halt leasing of federally-owned coal, specifically reserves in the Powder River Basin. The groups also asked for a comprehensive review of the country's coal leasing program. 

"The Department of Interior must ensure that coal companies do not cheat U.S. taxpayers, existing mines do not endanger our air, water and wildlife and are properly reclaimed," the groups wrote. They also cited concern about whether coal-based greenhouse gas emissions align with the government's environmental priorities.

An Interior official confirmed that the department had received and was reviewing the letter Monday, but declined comment. 

A representative of the Powder River Basin Resource Council said Monday that her group has for years backed the slowing of coal leasing to ensure better reclamation of mine sites.

"One of the main concerns we have is the Bureau of Land Management leasing new operations to miners that haven’t reclaimed existing mines," said Shannon Anderson, an organizer for the landowners group.

Anderson added that such a moratorium would have few effects on existing operations.

"It’s actually a fairly reasonable step in terms of these mining operations have multi-year reserves," she said."Nobody’s in threat of losing coal overnight if there’s a moratorium."

The director of the mining industry trade group in Wyoming called the letter "disappointing" and said a moratorium would be damaging to a major Wyoming industry.

"If they put a moratorium now it would be very damaging to the industry and the state," said Marion Loomis, executive director of the Wyoming Mining Association. "What utility is going to make long-term plans if they think a coal mine wouldn’t be available when they need it?"

Others who signed the moratorium letter -- including anti-coal power groups such as the Sierra Club and Greenpeace -- cited a variety of reasons for backing a coal moratorium. Chief among the group's concerns were coal's contribution to pollution, which their letter said would outweigh any advances made by new environmental regulations.

"Interior is poised to approve 3.5 billion tons of new coal mining, which would be an unprecedented expansion of federal coal extraction," the groups wrote. "DOI cannot facilitate these massive extraction projects without undermining President Obama’s commitment to address climate change."

The groups also wrote Jewell of their concerns over whether coal producers are paying fair royalty rates for coal mined in the U.S. but sold overseas. A similar concern from two lawmakers -- Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska -- led the Interior Department to launch an investigation into royalties.

Anderson said she didn't know whether to expect Jewell to take any action on the group's request. She did say, however, that the council and others have had discussions with the department about reviewing the federal leasing program.

"It’s day No. 1 on the job" for Jewell, she said. "It's the next step for a new Secretary."

Reach energy reporter Adam Voge at 307-266-0561, or at adam.voge@trib.com. Read his blog at http://trib.com/news/opinion/blogs/boom or follow him on Twitter @vogeCST.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. 1whocares
    Report Abuse
    1whocares - April 16, 2013 4:32 pm
    Thankfully sense is broughten by those who care for our natural world, who says we cant mine without sensible safety and regs to ensure the health of our lands, people and future generations. We must get with the times and keep issues at the forefront by providing sustainable development not a boom of disgust by caring not for wildlife and local inhabitants and repeaing the benefits for our personal gain while everything else dies off. Our future generations deserve better and not to suffer from Coal and coal waste products (including fly ash, bottom ash and boiler slag) releases approximately 20 toxic-release chemicals, including arsenic, lead, mercury, nickel, vanadium, beryllium, cadmium, barium, chromium, copper, molybdenum, zinc, selenium and radium, which are dangerous if released into the environment. While these substances are trace impurities, enough coal is burned that significant amounts of these substances are released and destroys and slowly kills all in its path. We must enact safe regulations to maintain the balnce for both Environment and economic sustainability. So use our minds for what its worth come up with innovative techniques to ensure the balance. Never give up on peace!
  2. ken
    Report Abuse
    ken - April 16, 2013 6:53 am
    Destroy the economy, print billions of worthless paper money, take honest peoples firearms, make America a socialist nation, shut off our electricity, kill our coal industry.... Who are you squirrel squeezing terrorists??? And why do you hate America so much?
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick