Groups worry about Wyoming natural gas project air emissions

2013-03-05T22:00:00Z 2013-04-01T10:01:33Z Groups worry about Wyoming natural gas project air emissionsBy ADAM VOGE Star-Tribune energy reporter Casper Star-Tribune Online

Several conservation groups are asking the nation’s land management agency to strengthen environmental protections before approving what would be Wyoming’s largest natural gas drilling project.

The Wyoming Outdoor Council, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council and others submitted comments to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management Tuesday asking the agency to beef up restrictions and limitations on the nearly 9,000-well Continental Divide-Creston Natural Gas project planned between Rock Springs and Rawlins.

“With a project this large, and this close to an existing area of unhealthy air pollution, it is imperative that the BLM gets this right,” Jon Goldstein, EDF’s senior energy policy manager, said in a prepared statement. “The BLM must ensure that it takes every measure it can to protect air quality, including doing some commonsense things like detecting and controlling pollution leaks from equipment.”

One company at the forefront of the project, Anadarko Petroleum, thinks the BLM’s study of the project — released late last year in a draft environmental impact statement — is sufficient. But the company indicated Tuesday a willingness to work with those interested in the project.

“We believe many of the measures included in the draft ensure protection for the natural environment while allowing for responsible energy production,” company spokesman Brian Cain said in an email. “We look forward to working with all stakeholders, as well as the BLM, as this process moves forward.”

Among the requests made by the conservation groups are an emphasis on multiple well pads utilizing directional drilling, enhanced resource protection plans for wildlife and vegetation, and continued maintenance of currently undeveloped tracts of land included in the project proposal.

The groups also hired an independent air quality expert, Megan Williams, who submitted comments saying the agency’s emissions estimates were too low. Williams’ analysis also concluded that the agency’s plan doesn’t include enough self-monitoring.

If approved, the Continental Divide-Creston project would quickly become Wyoming’s largest continuous project area approved by the federal government. The project area is a merger of two multicompany proposals made in 2005 and encompasses more than one million acres.

The roughly 20 companies involved in the project — including BP American Production, Anadarko Petroleum and Devon Energy — hope to develop the area over 15 years and operate the field about 50 years.

The public comment period on a draft environmental impact statement for the project closes today. Comments will be considered by the BLM before a final environmental impact statement is issued.

Reach energy reporter Adam Voge at 307-266-0561, or at or follow him on Twitter @vogeCST.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. carlover
    Report Abuse
    carlover - March 06, 2013 6:54 am
    the cycle is these groups get money from the federal government to inflict as much pain on these types of facilities, and in turn the epa makes more regualtions and in turn kills wyoming jobs. yep we need epa standards updated but so much so that it kills the industry here in wyoming and wyoming jobs. wonder if these groups would give a chit if they got no federal money?
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick