In boon for Wyoming producers, uranium holds steady

2012-09-27T08:00:00Z 2012-11-13T09:14:12Z In boon for Wyoming producers, uranium holds steadyBy JEREMY FUGLEBERG Star-Tribune business editor Casper Star-Tribune Online

It’s been more than 18 months since an earthquake and tsunami slammed the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan, but the following disaster is still washing over the price of uranium.

Uranium prices are holding steady at around the $50-a-pound mark — $48 in mid-September. That’s far shy of its recent high of $137 in 2007, but the price — and higher long-term contract prices — continues to encourage ongoing uranium development in the U.S., including several mine sites and processing facilities in Wyoming.

Still, the spot price of uranium stood at $67.75 per pound before the March 2011 disaster. Other than a short peak in November, the price has stabilized but not recovered.

A slow restart of Japan’s nuclear reactors and closures of reactors there and in Germany are holding the price down, says Resource Capital Research, an Australia-based market research firm, in a uranium sector analysis release in September.

Japan restarted two of its 50 reactors in July and faced protests. Additional reactor restarts are set to take place through 2014.

“Restarts are slower than initially expected, in part because of an increasingly vocal domestic opposition to nuclear power in Japan,” the firm said.

The analysis firm expects the uranium spot price to remain depressed into next year.

Yet the long-term contract price for uranium is about $10 a pound higher, priced at $60.25 on Aug. 31. That price hasn’t wavered more than a couple of dollars up or down for nearly a year, but it’s still below the $73-a-pound pre-Fukushima price.

And the uranium spot price continues its hover, while analysts continue to emphasize the strong mid- and long-term trends for uranium demand, on the strength of new reactor construction in China and India, among other nations.

“Strong growth in nuclear reactors is expected to continue, particularly in Asia, post Fukushima, with Chinese expansion expected to continue to lead the pack,” Resource Capital Research said.

Around the world, 65 nuclear reactors are now under construction, with another 483 either planned or proposed, according to numbers release in September by the World Nuclear Association, an industry trade group.

China remains the heavyweight for new nuclear energy, with 26 reactors under construction and 171 planned or proposed. One reactor is under construction in the U.S., with 26 either planned or proposed.

In terms of the uranium market, the proposed Wyoming projects with permits nearly in-hand or those ready to build may come online just in time.

Resource Capital Research sees a gap in supply opening due to a number of factors, including the 2013 end of a U.S.-Russian program to downblend highly enriched uranium, or HEU , from Russian nuclear weapons into fuel for nuclear power plants.

“There is potential for a supply gap to open up in the uranium market midterm due to declining supply from existing mines, deferral of new mining projects, the anticipated reduction in secondary supply with the termination of HEU at the end of 2013, and ongoing demand growth,” the analysis firm said.

One such deferred mining project is BHP Billiton’s late-August decision to look at other, less-expensive alternatives for its planned expansion of its Olympic Dam project in Australia. The expansion would’ve quadrupled the mine’s output to 40 million pounds in 2017.

“This announced delay will certainly accentuate the coming supply deficit, which has been forecast even if Olympic Dam were to expand” and hit 40 million pounds a year, said Rob Chang and Michael Wichterle of investment bank and research firm Versant Partners Inc., in an Aug. 23 industry update. “This will certainly put upward pressure on the longer term uranium price, and in turn the equities themselves.”

Such a supply gap would likely result in upward pressure on the price of uranium — a heartening sight for current and prospective producers of Wyoming uranium.

Reach Jeremy Fugleberg at 307-266-0623 or Read his blog at and follow him on Twitter: @jerenergy.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick