Police arrest three protesters at Peabody meeting in Gillette

2013-04-29T21:00:00Z 2015-04-29T17:17:05Z Police arrest three protesters at Peabody meeting in GilletteBy ADAM VOGE Star-Tribune energy reporter Casper Star-Tribune Online

GILLETTE -- Three protesters were arrested Monday by Gillette Police at a meeting of Peabody Energy shareholders at Gillette College on Monday, according to an activist group affiliated with the protesters.

One of the protesters, Fern MacDougal, would be charged with trespassing, according to campus police. She was climbing down from hanging an anti-Peabody banner in rafters at the entrance to the college building when she was arrested.

Two other protesters, Leslie Glustrom and an unidentified man, were stopped by police in the parking lot and handcuffed after failing to heed at least one warning not to hold a banner stating "Peabody Abandons Miners" in a particular fenced area, said Arielle Klagsbrun of the group Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment, in an emailed news release. They verbally protested with anti-Peabody slogans as they were taken away. 

MacDougal's banner read: "Peabody Attacks: Pensions, Diné Lands, Climate."  Diné is the word Navajo people to describe their tribe and the banner likely refers to Peabody's Black Mesa mining operations in Navajo and Hopi country in northeastern Arizona.

The three were among approximately 30 protesters from several groups, both from Wyoming and other states around the country, gathered in front of the college, the site chosen by Peabody Energy for its annual stockholders meeting.

Those protesting the company included a contingent of about 20 active and retired members of United Mine Workers of America. The miners for the second time in five days alleged that a company with major Wyoming operations had cost thousands of workers their health care and pension accounts.

The same group protested at an Arch Coal shareholder meeting Thursday in Wright. The union has said Arch and Peabody are responsible for the failure of Patriot Coal, a company which amassed some properties of both companies before going bankrupt, costing thousands their benefits.

Peabody representatives told the Star-Tribune prior to the meeting that what the miners allege isn’t the responsibility of their company.

“The simple fact is that Patriot Coal has been an individual company for five years,” said Vic Svec, company senior vice president for investor relations and corporate communications. “This is largely a matter between the UWMA and Patriot Coal, and it will be decided in bankruptcy court, not the court of public opinion.”

Joining the miners protesting in Wyoming were members of the Wyoming-based Powder River Basin Resource Council, which has actively asked that more care be taken be ensure mines are properly reclaimed and that water be protected. The group also recently signed its name to a request for a moratorium new Powder River Basin coal mining, sent earlier this month to the Department of the Interior.

Many protesters entered the meeting, but some who didn’t attend were redirected to a “free-speech zone,” a fenced-off area about 100 yards from Peabody’s registration tent. Some who entered the meeting were sent to an “overflow” area, a room on a different floor than the main meeting.

A Peabody official told the Star-Tribune that the meeting was full, and the room was being used to “accommodate all our shareholders.” The company had expected between 50 and 100 people to attend.

Members of the press were not allowed to attend the meeting.

Miners in Gillette protested mere hours after 6,000 others gathered some 1,100 miles away in St. Louis, home of both Arch and Peabody. The larger group gathered in front of the federal building where Patriot’s bankruptcy proceedings were underway. Sixteen were arrested.

Some have said Peabody chose Gillette to host the meeting as a ploy to avoid such protests, but the company has said it wants to show off its largest properties, including the North Antelope Rochelle mine.

Council organizer Shannon Anderson said before the meeting that her group wanted to show support for other protesters present.

“We just thought it was important to be here in solidarity with others impacted by Peabody’s mining operations,” Anderson said. “We have a lot of the same concerns as them."

Anderson and several miners planned to attend the meetings and ask questions relating to the company’s practices.

“We’re here today because we think what’s happening to these mine workers is standard practice to Peabody,” said Arielle Klagsbrun, a representative of Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment. Klagsburn’s group has a history of protesting Peabody and Arch events in St. Louis.

Svec said before the meeting that company representatives planned to tell shareholders of the upside of potential plans to export coal around the globe.

“This country needs to re-emerge as a great nation and great exporter,” he said in an interview. “Coal represents a significant way to do that.”

Svec added that shareholders attending the meeting would hear that power generators are switching to natural gas less now than they did last year, when the abysmal price of natural gas led some to switch away from coal. Some in the industry have blamed the fuel switch for shrinking coal demand.

When asked about the protests, Svec said Peabody had no obligations to the group choosing to gather.

“It’s been a great American tradition that shareholders meetings attract those who demonstrate for a variety of causes,” he said. “We acknowledge the tradition of freedom of speech, but we point out that this meeting is devoted to the business of the company, not general activism.”

Reach energy reporter Adam Voge at 307-266-0561, or at Read his blog at or follow him on Twitter @vogeCST.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(5) Comments

  1. Sassy
    Report Abuse
    Sassy - May 01, 2013 10:37 am
    What have the Unions done to improve the bottom line in the company? Please don't say wage concessions, there are plenty of folks who will work for less per hour AND they wont have to pay dues .

    If the Unions what to improve the bottom line- then I as I said get out in front and lead the company to profitability. Support exports and clean coal technology-- Earn your keep
  2. wyoandy
    Report Abuse
    wyoandy - May 01, 2013 10:24 am
    Stand with the company that wants to create more jobs but thanks to Obama and his statement "(I) will consider whatever policy tools are necessary, including standards that ban new traditional coal facilities, to ensure that we move quickly to commercialize and deploy low carbon coal technology"
    Well that is what Wyoming coal is, and the problem that UNIONS have is unlike the Eastern Unionized mines in which the labor force has cost themselves out of work, they also have substandard coal to what is in the Powder river Basin. Add to this equation that the right to work miners in Wyoming receive BETTER benefits without paying to have a job than that of the Union coal miner. It is not the worker that the mines are against, it is the CORRUPT UNION LEADERS who profit from the miners but in most cases have NEVER done the work of those they take the dues from. Dues that are meant to pay for "supposed better health care and pensions" When the Unions negotiated higher pensions the mines paid them, but something that Union supporters seem to always forget instead of the company handling the moneys for these pensions the UNIONS DEMANDED THAT THEY TAKE CHARGE OF THE MONEY AND THAT THEY DETERMINE THE INVESTMENTS FOR THIER WORKERS. The mines have already PAID the contract it is the CORRUPT UNIONS that have spent the money on their own wages, perks and other benefits such as Private Jets, Country Clubs and Resorts. UMWA President Cecil Edward Roberts received over $300000 in salary alone for 2012, add to that his perks, a private jet, company car, memberships in clubs and various organizations, health club, BETTER health insurance that the members who pay for it, a retirement package worth an estimated 21 million dollars AND compensation for his speaking engagements that top $100000 per time. Yeah that's right, he gets paid ON TOP of his salary to speak to the workers, nice huh? Well In his +30 years in upper Union Management, he definitely learned form the best. Richard Trumpka was the head of the UMWA but he's moved on to the Teamsters, where he gets paid WAY more now. Remember what I stated earlier about the leaders not actually working with in the industry that they blackmail the owners for? Trumpka is a prime example I mean how can a guy who was in charge of the miners for so long say he knows all about trucking enough to take over as its President. It's simple most Union Workers of today are substandard employees who realize with out the threat of organized laborer would have very little chance in getting a high paying job when placed against the right to work employee.
  3. sourshoes
    Report Abuse
    sourshoes - May 01, 2013 8:24 am
    Stand with the company raking in all of the profits and laying off employees, stand with the executives being paid millions for treating workers like dogs ............. sounds like a great idea
  4. Pops
    Report Abuse
    Pops - April 30, 2013 10:41 am
    Activism...At least they our doing something.
  5. Sassy
    Report Abuse
    Sassy - April 30, 2013 6:17 am
    The company tells it's shareholder they need to export, unions thugs draw lines in the sand.

    If Unions want to keep jobs for their members- they must stand alongside Peabody...not stand in front of them with clinched fists.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick