Conflict?

Rep. David Miller, a coal company board member, authors law to increase coal exports

Wyoming Infrastructure Authority adds coal to promotion duties
2014-03-26T20:00:00Z 2014-03-27T10:59:07Z Rep. David Miller, a coal company board member, authors law to increase coal exportsBy BENJAMIN STORROW Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

The Wyoming Infrastructure Authority has developed a reputation for touting the Cowboy State’s wind resources.

But starting in July the agency will assume an additional responsibility: hawking coal, or, more specifically, coal exports. State lawmakers expanded the authority’s purview during the recent legislative session to include the promotion of coal export docks.

Such facilities are viewed as critical to Powder River Basin coal producers’ ability to tap Asian markets, but have met fierce opposition from environmentalists. Three terminals have been proposed for the Pacific Northwest. None have yet to receive the green light from regulators.

Under its expanded role, the WIA will advocate for coal export terminals and may even provide some of the necessary financing. The agency has bonding authority up to $1 billion but thus far has used only $50 million.

“The infrastructure authority is charged with growing the state’s economy through the development of electric transmission. There is a natural fit between the current work of the authority and expanding coal markets,” said Renny MacKay, a spokesman for Gov. Matt Mead. “The governor believes there is opportunity for Wyoming, which can be enhanced by the infrastructure authority’s involvement.”

Possible conflict?

The lawmaker behind the expansion bill is Rep. David Miller, a Riverton Republican who sits on the board of an Australian company that has the stated purpose of exporting North American coal.

Miller, a professional geologist with mineral holdings throughout the state, became a County Coal Limited board member in 2011 after selling his mineral rights in the Powder River Basin to the Sydney-based company for $200,000.

He told the Gillette News-Record that year he received 1 million shares in the company and would receive 3 percent royalty on any coal production. And he promised to abstain from any votes in the Legislature concerning the company’s interests.

On Wednesday, Miller said there was no connection between County Coal interests and the WIA legislation.

“That particular company is not worried about Wyoming coal. They haven’t even been to Wyoming,” Miller said, adding that much of County Coal’s focus has been in Canada.

Instead, Miller said, the intent of the legislation is to help preserve Wyoming’s tax base. Much of the state’s revenue is generated by severance taxes on coal production. And with American utilities moving away from coal in favor of natural gas because of stricter environmental regulations, Asia represents the best opportunity to sell Wyoming coal, he said.

Originally, Miller hoped to use $300 million in surplus state funds to build an export terminal in the Pacific Northwest. But when the state’s lawyers told him that wasn’t possible, he settled on the expansion of the WIA’s responsibility as the next best alternative.

Miller said he hoped the state commitment helps spur private investment in coal export facilities.

“I think industry is going to take note Wyoming is serious about this and will move a little faster,” Miller said.

Weak disclosure laws

Legislative observers said they were not familiar enough with the legislation or Miller’s business interests to comment on whether the measure constituted a conflict of interest. But the case does highlight the Legislature’s weak public disclosure laws, they said.

Erich Frankland, chair of the Casper College political science department, said most states require lawmakers to divulge their business interests, and some require legislators to abstain from votes in which they have a personal interest. In Wyoming, such disclosures are voluntary.

“That is one of the things with our state law. There are a lot of gray areas,” Frankland said. “It does encourage self-interpretation.”

Situations like Miller’s are inevitable in a citizen legislature, said Equality State Policy Center Executive Director Dan Neal. Many legislators have extensive business interests in the state, he noted.

Wyoming would benefit from clearer rules spelling out what constitutes a conflict of interest, he said. The public would know if lawmakers’ votes are enriching their financial interests and legislators would have added clarity of what constitutes a conflict of interest, he said.

“This doesn’t begin with Dave Miller or end with Dave Miller,” Neal said. “We would like to see the Legislature tackle this. If we are going to stick with a citizen legislature, how are we going to deal with this?”

Attempts to reach County Coal on Wednesday were unsuccessful. The company’s website listed two coal projects in the Powder River Basin – Shell Creek and Miller – with combined estimated reserves of 730 million tons of “low cost, export-quality” coal. The company also said it is submitting plans to construct a 20 million ton loading terminal in British Columbia that “can be used by Powder River Basin, U.S. coal projects.”

Miller said he did not think the WIA legislation constituted a conflict of interest. The expansion of the infrastructure authority’s responsibilities deals with the industry at large, not a specific company or area from which he would profit, he said. In that sense, his proposal was similar to a teacher or college administrator serving in the Legislature voting on raises for public employees or pension increases, he said.

And he expressed doubts over County Coal’s ability to construct an export facility, saying “I don’t think they have the wherewithal to do that. It would be someone like Peabody, Rio Tinto. A small company doesn’t have the wherewithal to bite off something that big.”

But he acknowledged Wyoming’s conflict of interest rules can be unclear. Miller said he abstained from votes in the past that would affect his mineral leases, prompting questions from the House’s Republican leadership and industry.

“They want me to vote for what I think is best for Wyoming, which is what I do,” he said. “It is a gray area, I admit. It is confusing what to do in those circumstances.”

Meanwhile, the infrastructure authority is preparing for its new role of promoting coal and wind. Loyd Drain, the authority’s director, said the agency has been meeting with key players in industry and government to prepare a strategy so it can begin work on July 1, when its coal responsibilities commence.

And where some might see a conflict simultaneously promoting a renewable like wind and a fossil fuel like coal, Drain embraced the role.

“I don’t find representing the horizon of Wyoming’s resources, I don’t find that to be problematic,” Drain said. “Our state is so blessed with a variety of resources [that] we would be remiss if we didn’t try to market all of them.”

Reach energy reporter Benjamin Storrow at 307-335-5344 or benjamin.storrow@trib.com. Follow him on Twitter @bstorrow

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(9) Comments

  1. wyoslick
    Report Abuse
    wyoslick - March 27, 2014 9:39 pm
    "Money" didn't elect anyone. In fact, "money" didn't cast a single ballot.
  2. Dewd
    Report Abuse
    Dewd - March 27, 2014 10:38 am
    The political culture in Wyoming is structured to mask the palpable Conflicts of Interest , while amplifying the interest in conflicts.

    Somewhat related, if it weren't for rampant Nepotism, the state's unemployment rate would be north of 30 percent...
  3. rigrat
    Report Abuse
    rigrat - March 27, 2014 9:59 am
    Thriving energy industry? Tell it to all the laid off oil patch hands when the rigs go down again,and we know they will eventually.The problem is too many out of staters want to make a fast buck from Wyoming's dirt and the fools who let them do it are not smart enough to stop it.
  4. rigrat
    Report Abuse
    rigrat - March 27, 2014 9:56 am
    Agreed.
  5. StupidCitizen
    Report Abuse
    StupidCitizen - March 27, 2014 9:37 am
    Reason, are you seriously using past unethical and potentially illegal activities as justification for Miller's unethical and self-serving bill? Really? This isn't a republican or democratic issue as you would have use believe, it's about the ethics of, and misplaced trust in, our elected officials. People we place into office to protect their constituents, not line their own pockets.
  6. Justin thyme
    Report Abuse
    Justin thyme - March 27, 2014 8:57 am
    Disclosure of possible conflict of interests and recusing oneself from voting has always been a sad state of affairs by our legislators. And we certainly don't have a "citizens legislature" when we see whose money elected them.
    We can only hope that someday we see folks act with moral integrity and ethical behavior. We have that in community businesses for the most part, perhaps it will yet come to behavior in our legislature.


  7. pappy
    Report Abuse
    pappy - March 27, 2014 7:58 am
    Reason if you don't see anything wrong with what you just said then you are part of the problem. It doesn't matter if your conservative, liberal or some where in between. if you sponsor or vote for legislation that directly benefits you it is a conflict of interest. Just because it goes on all the time in WY legislature doesn't make it right.
  8. Reason
    Report Abuse
    Reason - March 27, 2014 7:21 am
    Our "citizen legislature" is comprised of folks from many different walks of life. History shows that the lawyers (such as Tony Ross, Phil Nicholas, Mary Throne,Tom Lubnau, etc, etc) write laws to benefit their clients; the teachers author bills to give themselves raises; the farmers and ranchers pass laws that benefit them exclusively; the retired railroaders write laws to support their railroad pension fund; the bankers pass laws to benefit their members; and on and on. Why should legislators with an interest in our energy industry be any different? At least our energy industry provides thousands of good paying jobs in Wyoming and those workers support many other industries here. Truthfully, if it weren't for the thriving energy industry in Wyoming, we wouldn't be able to afford lawyers, bankers, teachers, etc. The Star-Tribune is behaving true to form, creating conflict and controversy where there is none and asking activist liberal Democrats like Erich Frankland and Dan Neal to give their "expert" opinion on Republican legislators while they themselves have happily cashed paychecks written to them by the State of Wyoming. THERE is your conflict of interest, Star-Tribune.
  9. Sania
    Report Abuse
    Sania - March 27, 2014 2:39 am
    good post..

    Packers and Movers in Delhi Ncr, Packers and Movers in Gurgaon
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick