Review released for TransWest power line from Wyoming to Nevada

2013-07-03T19:00:00Z 2013-07-10T22:02:11Z Review released for TransWest power line from Wyoming to NevadaBy LAURA HANCOCK Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

A draft environmental review for a proposed 725-mile, 3,000-megawatt electrical transmission line that would stretch across four states suggests deviating from the route that the Denver company building the line wants in Wyoming.

The Bureau of Land Management and the Western Area Power Administration released the draft review of the TransWest Express LLC transmission line Wednesday. It considers impacts to the environment, people and cultural resources. In Wyoming, the federal agencies proposed shifting the route to avoid hurting views and the greater sage grouse, a bird that is threatened to be listed under the Endangered Species Act.

The overall proposed route would start near Sinclair and end near Boulder City, Nev. Transmission lines would also go through Colorado and Utah.

In Wyoming, TransWest, a subsidiary of Anschutz Corp., wants the route to start near Sinclair, then head west, just south of Interstate 80 to Wamsutter. In Wamsutter, it would turn south and follow the Carbon-Sweetwater county line, then head southwest to cross into Colorado, according to the draft review.

The company developed the route with the Carbon and Sweetwater county commissions, as well as the Moffat County Commission in Colorado, said TransWest spokeswoman Kara Choquette. The three commissions signed a document in support of the route in 2011.

But the federal agencies’ preferred route follows the company’s route from the beginning to 15 miles south of Wamsutter. Then it would diverge to the east and parallel Wyoming Highway 789 for about four miles. Just before Baggs, the route would turn west and follow the Shell Creek Stock Trail road for 20 miles, then cross into Sweetwater County and rejoin the company’s preferred route into Colorado.

TransWest plans to transmit Wyoming wind along the line to customers in Arizona, Nevada and California, Choquette said.

TransWest is a subsidiary of The Anschutz Corp. Another Anschutz subsidiary, Power Co. of Wyoming, is planning the 1,000-turbine project, the country’s largest wind farm, in Carbon County. Choquette said the projects are independent of each other.

Choquette said the company doesn’t yet have an opinion about the Wednesday’s draft review. Employees are still reviewing it.

“Something we will do over the next 90 days is look at what the analysis says and we will provide comments like everyone else,” she said.

Loyd Drain, executive director of the Wyoming Infrastructure Authority, a quasi-government agency that works to diversify the state’s economy through improvements in electric transmission infrastructure, saw the draft review but said he was focusing more on the big picture.

“Without a doubt, this project will definitely be good for the reliability of the grid,” he said. “It will be good for California ratepayers. It will be good for Wyoming in that it will create lots of new jobs. We are excited about the fact that this project is moving forward.”

Renny MacKay, a spokesman for Gov. Matt Mead, said the governor will study the draft review and submit comments. He supported the route that the three counties wanted, “and as the commissioners review the draft, he will seek their perspective,” MacKay said in an email.

Carbon County Commissioner Lindy Glode said that the three counties wanted to keep the transmission lines away from the communities of Baggs, Dixon and Savery. The agencies’ preference brings the lines closer to the communities. But she doesn’t think the federal agencies’ route is drastically different.

“I think we can negotiate it,” she said. “I think it will be OK.”

Reach state reporter Laura Hancock at 307-266-0581 or at Follow her on Twitter: @laurahancock.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. This is a forum for community discussion, and we'd rather address your concerns directly. It would be better to write the editors at, or call Editor Mandy Burton at 307-266-0545.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't, or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime, or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick