STORROW: Cindy Hill, firing squads and higher bonds for new wells

2014-02-02T08:00:00Z 2014-03-10T08:08:06Z STORROW: Cindy Hill, firing squads and higher bonds for new wellsBy BENJAMIN STORROW Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

This year’s legislative session sure is starting to look like a firecracker. I know, I know. It’s an off-year and the hurdle for considering bills is higher. It’s supposed to be all budgets and boring stuff. But with Cindy Hill somewhere in the vicinity of the Department of Education and a few lawmakers talking firing squads how drab could the 20-day legislative confab be?

The bill I want to talk about isn’t as sensational as, say, decriminalizing marijuana possession of less than an ounce, but it is arguably more important.

Gov. Matt Mead has proposed spending $3 million over the next four years to plug 1,200 wells abandoned in the Powder River Basin after the bust of the coal-bed methane industry. All indications are that something is going to get done on this. The question is what exactly.

Almost everyone agrees on this much: the abandoned wells need plugging. The Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission closed a meager 183 wells between 2004 and 2013 and the tally provided by the governor’s office only includes wells currently orphaned on state land. Another 912 wells may become abandoned as a result of Colorado developer Luca Technologies Inc., which is in ongoing bankruptcy proceedings.

Groups as diverse as industry group Petroleum Association of Wyoming and Sheridan-based environmental group Powder River Basin Resource Council are behind a proposal to increase production taxes on oil and gas companies to cover the costs of a plugging program.

The disagreement is largely over the bonds companies pay to cover their wells. The bonds are intended to cover the cost of plugging a well in the event a company runs into financial trouble and doesn’t have the cash to close it.

The Powder River Basin Resource Council argues raising the requirements would keep smaller, less financially capable companies out of the equation. The Petroleum Association says that would increase production costs. It is also unnecessary, they say, as the WOGCC can always raise the bond on a well if a company runs into financial trouble.

The proposal to raise the bond limit is especially notable as it comes as the Powder River Basin is entering a new boom, this time fueled by unconventional oil plays in the “tight” Niobrara and Frontier shale formations. The Bureau of Land Management is preparing an environmental analysis in anticipation of seeing up to 5,000 new oil wells drilled in Converse County alone. Few industry observers expect the number to be that high, but even 1,500 new wells would double the number currently in the county.

Higher bond limits would apply to these wells too – and that’s a good thing. History is instructive here. For one, raising the bonds on companies when they run into trouble is a case of too little too late. Operators like Luca are often more willing to go bankrupt than assume the costs of plugging their wells, leaving Wyoming taxpayers and responsible operators holding the tab.

The CBM boom also taught us the majority of operators were responsible. No one is complaining that Anadarko won't close the CBM wells it drilled and still operates. The problem, once again, are those bad actors like Luca.

In the CBM boom, larger companies drilled the wells, milked them for the maximum return and then sold them to their smaller counterparts, who were often unable to cover the cost of plugging the old wells.

Unconventional plays are a different beast to be sure. They use different technology, extract oil - not gas - and the economics look promising. CBM was a flash in the pan. These unconventional plays look like they may last for years, if not decades.

But the nature of unconventional plays is that wells produce lots of oil in their first few years and then tail off dramatically. It is not hard to imagine a scenario where many of these new wells are drilled, the profits collected and then the wells sold to smaller operators who can’t pay the costs of closing them.

As the saying goes, those who don’t know history are destined to repeat it.

Reach energy reporter Benjamin Storrow at 307-266-0535 or Follow him on Twitter @bstorrow

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. Wyoming Girl88
    Report Abuse
    Wyoming Girl88 - February 03, 2014 10:57 am
    And for clarification, the conservation tax is paid by operators per barrel of oil or thousand cubic feet of gas produced. The citizens of Wyoming don't pay that.
  2. Wyoming Girl88
    Report Abuse
    Wyoming Girl88 - February 02, 2014 8:08 pm
    I am 100% for improving the state's bonding requirements, but it's important that we stop (perhaps unknowingly) misrepresenting where money comes from to plug orphaned wells. Money used by the state to plug these wells comes from forfeited bonds - however insufficient, and the conservation tax. No where is the state yet using taxpayer dollars to plug these wells.
  3. rigrat
    Report Abuse
    rigrat - February 02, 2014 1:22 pm
    Permits for coal bed methane wells should have never been allowed without assurance for the nasty end results,which obviously has happened and we the people will pay for this fiasco one way or another.The old BS of allowing oil and gas companies free run needs to be stopped.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick