Wyoming wind officials say a University of Wyoming wind energy study released Thursday is already aiding their efforts as they try to pitch the state's resource in California.

Data from the study show that combining Wyoming wind resources with those in California could reduce power source variability and save the Golden State money -- as much as $100 million per year.

Past Wyoming sales pitches have met with decided reluctance by California, which would prefer to rely solely on its own power generation.

Loyd Drain, executive director of the Wyoming Infrastructure Authority, said he and other representatives of the state's wind industry have already started to use data from the study in meetings with top California officials.

"It's been the centerpiece of our outreach effort to California," he said. "We've met with over 40 key officials. The fact that they’re opening their doors and allowing us to share with them the results of this study means a lot."

A call to study author Jonathan Naughton was not returned Thursday. The study, "Wind Diversity Enhancement of Wyoming/California Wind Energy Projects," is the first analysis of a four-part University of Wyoming Wind Energy Research Center study on diversity of wind resources around the country.

Researchers used atmospheric wind data to log wind density and variability from five sites in Wyoming either near existing or planned wind facilities and compared them with similar sites in California. Wyoming sites used in the study include areas near Casper, Medicine Bow, Rawlins, Wheatland and the southern Laramie Valley.

Among the findings of the study -- most of which could help Wyoming wind producers -- are that the state holds a far greater area with high potential for wind projects, especially in the southeast part of the state.

The study also indicated that Wyoming and California winds are complementary, meaning that Wyoming wind peaks could offset low outputs of California wind and reduce variability, a common criticism of the power source.

Researchers also said stability from adding Wyoming wind would reduce the need for standby dispatchable power generation, which could save $100 million every year.

Drain said the study presented few surprises.

"If you live in Wyoming, you know we have good wind resources," he said. "We always assumed our wind would blow at different times than wind in different states."

The infrastructure authority and university will now turn their attention to a second phase of the same study, in which real-time data will be logged and compared to the atmospheric data used in phase one. Drain said he expects results from the second phase to be "even more profound" than the first.

The wind research lab will also begin work on the three remaining parts of the study, which will also compare Wyoming wind to wind in Colorado, Nebraska and itself.

Drain said the study has helped Wyoming's wind lobby get a foot in the Californian doorway. He added that they'll "keep plugging away" in the hope of finding more results soon.

"This is not smoke and mirrors," he said. "We’re not trying to tell (California) what to do, but say, 'Here’s what Wyoming can do for California. At the end of the day, it’s up to you what you can do with it.'"

Reach energy reporter Adam Voge at 307-266-0561, or at adam.voge@trib.com. Read his blog at http://trib.com/news/opinion/blogs/boom or follow him on Twitter @vogeCST.

(4) comments




Proof once again universities hire people who care nothing about truth, facts or anything but cash. Once again, Wyoming would give all of its first born to the Devil to get "jobs" and look pretty and open-minded to the world (how did we get so STUPID and DESPERATE????). They will also completely pillage the state--which is why the state went with "Forever West" for the motto. All the past mottos got in the way of pillaging and being a dumping ground for the nation. Wind energy DOES NOT WORK. It's a fact--never did, never will. But if we can wipe out open spaces, sage grouse and reek havoc on the plains, who gives a crap? Destroy away--and don't forget to hand over that first born.


At some point, the Legislature is going to have to look at the wisdom of spending public money on the Wyoming Infrastructure Authority, if what it persists in doing is traveling out to Sacramento to pitch Wyoming wind. Fact is, California is getting its energy situation under control through efficiency measures, locally sited industrial generation and distributed generation. The question at this point is whether we should be dismantling transmission from Wyoming to the West Coast, not building more of it. And certainly not to facilitate wind energy development - the most primitive of all the renewable-energy technologies. Gov Mead needs to stop approving Loyd Drain's travel expense requests, and the Legislature should end the funding for the Infrastructure Authority.


i don't believe we should be destroying our natural environment to sell wind power to California. I don't think people understand or know that Wyomingites do NOT utilize this energy. We give away our water and allow our land to burn due to lack of water; now we give away our wind and have to PAY enormous ulitility bill to pay for it. (told to me by a PPL rep that we help fund the project with our electric bill) I believe in clean energy (solar/wind) but only if WE CAN USE IT, are given opportunity to afford it for our own consumption. But destroy our land to give it to a defunct state that can't pay their own employees? do you really think they'll do good on paying what we charge? I think not.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.