Wyoming agencies to lead further investigation into Pavillion water concerns

2013-06-20T14:30:00Z 2013-07-02T18:53:08Z Wyoming agencies to lead further investigation into Pavillion water concernsBy ADAM VOGE Star-Tribune energy reporter Casper Star-Tribune Online

A federal environmental regulator will not finish and review a draft report tentatively linking hydraulic fracturing to Wyoming groundwater contamination and will instead allow state agencies to further investigate the issue.

Wyoming state agencies will lead a new round of investigation and file a report concerning Pavillion-area water quality by Sept. 30, 2014.

In a media release issued today, the state of Wyoming announced it will undertake a new effort to evaluate water quality from certain domestic water wells and the mechanical integrity of some oil and gas wells and pits near Pavillion.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in December 2011 released a report tentatively linking hydraulic fracturing to Pavillion groundwater quality. The agency will not continue studying the matter.

"In light of this announcement, we believe that EPA’s focus going forward should be on using our resources to support Wyoming’s efforts, which will build on EPA’s monitoring results," EPA Acting Administrator Bob Perciasepe said in the release. "We applaud the leadership of Wyoming in conducting further investigation and assuring safe water and look forward to partnering with the state as it conducts its investigation."

Gov. Matt Mead lauded the state, EPA and Encana Oil and Gas, which owns the natural gas field near Pavillion, for reaching an agreement.

"It is in everyone’s best interest – particularly the citizens who live outside of Pavillion – that Wyoming and the EPA reach an unbiased, scientifically supportable conclusion," Mead said in a prepared statement. "I commend the EPA and Encana for working with me to chart a positive course for this investigation."

Encana will donate $1.5 million, both for the investigation and for further education concerning groundwater issues.

Concerns from citizens led the EPA to launch an investigation into the area's water quality in 2009. The agency drilled two monitoring wells in the area in 2010; in December 2011 the agency released a draft report which tentatively linked water contamination to hydraulic fracturing, an oil and gas production technique.

Industry and Wyoming officials alike took issue with the report, and calls for more investigation led the agency to extend its public comment period and allow the U.S. Geological Survey to retest the wells.

The survey released testing data in the fall without analysis. In October, the EPA announced it would take comments on the data until January, followed by a peer review panel.

But in January, the EPA again delayed its comment period until Sept. 30. The state intends to complete its report a year later.

Check back for more on this story.

Reach energy reporter Adam Voge at 307-266-0561, or at adam.voge@trib.com. Read his blog at http://trib.com/news/opinion/blogs/boom or follow him on Twitter @vogeCST.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. sloopynumber1
    Report Abuse
    sloopynumber1 - June 21, 2013 9:16 am
    Fracking companies don't want to release the names of the chemicals they use in their operations because they know the chemicals are dangerous and will eventually poison water and the environment. States like Tenn., Wyoming and New York that are considering fracking should look at what has happened in Penn. and Ohio. Please learn from mistakes that others have made. Our children's health and future are not for sale today.
  2. Cody Coyote
    Report Abuse
    Cody Coyote - June 20, 2013 7:07 pm
    Which is greater?

    The pressure in pounds per square inch applied by fracking techniques to shatter solid rock underground , or the industrial-political pressure brought to bear on the EPA to drop the testing ?

    Fair question.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick