Wyoming agency approves changes to planned wind farm in Converse County

2013-12-21T18:00:00Z 2013-12-21T18:41:16Z Wyoming agency approves changes to planned wind farm in Converse CountyBy LAURA HANCOCK Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

SARATOGA -- The Wyoming Industrial Siting Council last week approved changes to the planned Wasatch Wind project in Converse County.

The changes include moving the locations of some wind turbines and a substation within the project’s already approved area. Wasatch Wind’s Casper-based attorney, John Masterson, described them as small, “micro-siting adjustments.”

“A lot of these modifications would generally be done administratively within the [Industrial Siting] Division,” Masterson told the council at a meeting at a Saratoga community center on Wednesday. “We felt in consultation with the division, the most prudent way would be to bring it in front of you.”

Christine Mikell, president of Park City, Utah-based Wasatch Wind and Power LLC, said the company requested the changes for environmental and wildlife reasons, including moving some of the turbines 150 meters to 200 meters to the west to reduce visual impacts. Among the wildlife impacts are the threat of raptors being killed by the turbines, she said.

Wasatch Wind first announced the project, called Pioneer Wind Park, in 2010. It's now planned to have 46 turbines and produce 80 megawatts of power. State law requires any construction project costing $190.8 million or more to go before the seven-member siting council for approval.

Pioneer Wind Park will be outside of Glenrock, but construction has been stalled after to a series of legal challenges from residents in the area and financial hurdles. The project’s financial partner, Edison Mission Energy, filed for bankruptcy last year. At the time, the siting council gave Wasatch Wind until May 2014 to find a financial partner and until July to break ground. Then Rock Mountain Power’s power purchase agreement with Wasatch Wind expired.

The landowners who have challenged the project joined to form the Northern Laramie Range Alliance. Their attorney, Casper-based Peter Nicolaysen, challenged Wasatch Wind’s request in this week's siting council meeting in Saratoga, saying it lacked details and substance. He said he didn’t know whether the changes would really help mitigate effects on views and wildlife.

“They’ve told us nothing about those environmental impacts,” he said.

As part of his argument against Wasatch Wind, Nicolaysen presented the siting council with a document that members of the council said they didn't have time to read on the day they were to make the decision -- before voting in favor of Wasatch Wind’s request.

“We can’t hold these proceedings and have this kind of information or any other be dumped on us at this point,” siting council Chairman Shawn Warner of Powell said.

Reach state reporter Laura Hancock at 307-266-0581 or at laura.hancock@trib.com. Follow her on Twitter: @laurahancock.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. thehousemouse
    Report Abuse
    thehousemouse - December 21, 2013 7:44 pm
    I always hoped that when citzens united against a common enemy, the setting commissioners and councils would abide by their oath of office and rule in favor of the people before the big green Lie of wind energy. Perhaps when voting comes around next year for us all we take part in unseating the enemies of the freedom and selling out our state to green lies. weather its conservation on water or towers. we are being sold out for personal gain by the elite who swore to protect us from these kinds of enviromental lies.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick