Wyoming to begin work on orphaned wells

2014-04-08T07:00:00Z Wyoming to begin work on orphaned wellsBy BENJAMIN STORROW Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

Wyoming regulators are prepared to begin plugging some of the 1,200 abandoned coal-bed methane wells on state and private land in the Powder River Basin. 

The effort to close the abandoned wells comes several years after the collapse of the CBM industry and amid increasing pressure from landowners, who want the wells reclaimed or converted to water production. Gov. Matt Mead announced a plan in December to spend $3 million to close about 300 wells in each of the next four years. 

"I think if the state keeps their foot on the accelerator we can do 300 in a year," said Robert King, an independent contractor hired by the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission to spearhead the effort.

The state has finalized plans to plug 67 wells south of Gillette and will begin work as soon as weather permits. The Oil and Gas Commission is also accepting bids to close another 141 wells in Campbell and Sheridan counties, King said.  

Still, challenges remain. Luca Technologies Inc., a Colorado gas firm, filed for bankruptcy last year. The company's 900 wells could be added to the list of those Wyoming needs to close, raising the scope and cost of the state's plugging program.  

"That could impact our scheduling," King said, noting the state is waiting to see how the bankruptcy works out before it commits to further plugging.  

Luca officials have proposed selling a subsidiary, Patriot Energy Resources, to High Plains Gas, a Sheridan company. The sale would prevent the wells from being officially abandoned.  

But the proposal was warily greeted by Oil and Gas Commission officials. At a March commission meeting, former Oil and Gas Supervisor Grant Black raised doubts over High Plains ability to afford the bonds on Luca's wells. The Wyoming company paid $1.1 million of the $4.9 million in bonds owed to the state for its wells. 

Closing non-producing wells is the responsibility of producers, who pay bonds on their wells to cover the reclamation costs in the event they run into financial trouble. If producers go bankrupt, the task of closing the wells falls to the state. The state uses the bond funds and production taxes on oil and gas operators to pay for the plugging. 

An Oil and Gas Commission hearing scheduled for today on the proposed Patriot Energy sale was postponed until July, according to the commission's website. The reason for the postponement was not immediately clear. Oil and Gas Commission officials did not return requests for comment by press time. 

Jill Morrison, an organizer at Powder River Basin Resource Council, a landowners group, worried the number of wells the state needs to close may rise. There are many companies that are not officially bankrupt but stopped production years ago and have not paid mineral royalties to landowners, she noted. 

"We know we have a whole other set of companies on this list," she said. "They (the commission) are getting rolling, but they’ve got a huge job ahead of them."

Others were pleased with the progress. At a recent meeting in Gillette, many landowners expressed interest in converting the former CBM wells to water wells, said John Robitaille, vice president of Petroleum Association of Wyoming. 

He said the industry group is supportive of the state's efforts and has backed a proposal to raise production taxes on producers to cover the cost of the plugging program.

"I think they are moving forward, and I’m pleased to see that," Robitaille said. 

Reach energy reporter Benjamin Storrow at 307-335-5344 or benjamin.storrow@trib.com. Follow him on Twitter @bstorrow

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(5) Comments

  1. nobita
    Report Abuse
    nobita - April 09, 2014 5:05 am
    These plans need to be made and the numbers need to be specified, we believe in it and what is possible.
  2. dileep
    Report Abuse
    dileep - April 09, 2014 4:14 am
    Such pollution could consist of uranium, benzene, etc. If you're a rancher or group using that groundwater, would you want to stay hydrated with such contaminants? In the future if the area is still able to produce methane, etc., then a new effectively designed well will do the secret to success. IPL 2014
  3. Campbell
    Report Abuse
    Campbell - April 08, 2014 11:25 am
    Edge, it's economics. The cost of extraction of these wells exceeded the company's ability to remain in business. Whether the well is producing or not is of secondary importance to the laws of economics.
  4. PokesnBroncos
    Report Abuse
    PokesnBroncos - April 08, 2014 10:14 am
    Improperly abandoned wells present a problem of cross-communication within the geologic layers in the well shaft. For example, if the well is 1,000 feet deep but not property plugged then there is the real possibility of contamination of usable groundwater aquifers which may be located between the surface and well's bottom. Such contamination could include uranium, benzene, etc. If you're a rancher or community utilizing that groundwater, would you want to drink water with such contaminants? Down the road if the area is still capable of producing methane, etc., then a new properly constructed well will do the trick.
  5. Edge
    Report Abuse
    Edge - April 08, 2014 10:03 am
    This doesn't make sense to me. If wells are still producing methane doesn't it make sense that we would have less environmental impact in the future if we used these wells? Or, as some old wells have shown, they start producing again wouldn't we avoid more roads, rigs and whatever else is needed for a new well?
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick