Recycling

Landfill closures result in increased recycling

2014-08-23T12:00:00Z Landfill closures result in increased recyclingBy CHRISTINE PETERSON Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

Three years ago, Sundance’s city council made a bold decision to require all of its residents to recycle household items.

Each house received a blue bag for everything from water bottles to newspapers to be placed on the curb each week. A truck from Gillette came by to collect.

Bills went up $4.35 per month and residents grumbled, but everyone knew the stakes.

“The council’s idea was if we could pay for it up front and get it out of our garbage, we wouldn’t have to increase rates later,” said Kathy Lenz, Sundance’s clerk and treasurer.

And it worked. The town has reduced its garbage by 50 percent, and less garbage means lower bills.

Sundance is one of dozens of Wyoming towns facing landfill closures due to potential groundwater contamination. It was the first of many to realize that even if recycling didn’t pay for itself, it was cheaper than the alternative.

“Anything they divert locally, they miss a tipping fee on the other end,” said Craig McOmie, recycling coordinator with the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality. “We will see a lot of changes in the next five or so years.”

Leaking toxins

No one thought Wyoming landfills would leak toxins into the ground. The state was too arid, that was a problem for rainy places like the Pacific Northwest or New England. But then eight years ago, the state started testing landfills, McOmie said.

More than 90 percent of the landfills tested were leaking significant amounts of toxins into the ground, tests showed. So Wyoming DEQ gave most cities and counties an option: line the landfills to prevent leakage, or close and cap them and start shipping garbage to an approved facility.

Lining a small landfill is expensive. Capping, closing and building a transfer station is also expensive, but the state is offering grants to pay for up to 75 percent of those costs, he said.

Cities like Casper and Laramie chose to line their landfills, while cities like Sundance and Rawlins chose to cap and close theirs.

Casper receives waste now from seven communities as close as Glenrock and far as Baggs and Rawlins, said Cynthia Langston, Casper’s solid waste manager.

“I’m going to be marketing for more towns as soon as we upgrade the baler building,” Langston said. “In the next year or year and a half we will be able to market to more communities. The more waste we get, the lower I can offer for a tipping fee. Then it’s cheaper for everybody.”

Other lined landfills include ones in Campbell, Park and Lincoln counties, Torrington, Cheyenne and Rock Springs.

Many towns could not line their landfills, which means within the next seven years, about 20 Wyoming landfills will be closing, McOmie said. Closures mean not only immediate costs in building a transfer station and capping but long term costs in shipping.

Those costs are how a small town in northeast Wyoming became the first place to require that residents pay for recycling.

A cheaper solution

The city of Sundance didn’t come to a mandatory recycling decision lightly, Lenz said. But it knew it had to close its landfill and faced steep transport costs.

“We knew we had to get our tonnage down when we started to transfer,” she said.

The recycling program pays for itself with a monthly fee, and when the city starts trucking garbage, it will have half as much as earlier years. The costs to ship to Casper or Gillette could be about $100 a ton. Less garbage means less money, she said.

McOmie has been using similar logic with cities across Wyoming for years.

Recycling programs don’t always pay for themselves. But if it costs $30 a ton to recycle, and $100 a ton to truck waste to another landfill, the savings add up, he said.

Some cities, like Rawlins, have found ways to make money on their recycling, said Marty Holloway, the Rawlins landfill and recycling superintendent.

He figures the city makes about $800 a month recycling all of the common household items. The city worked out a deal with the Wyoming State Penitentiary, which increases its volume and adds to savings.

“Slowly we’ve made changes so we make money,” Holloway said. “We shipped 66 percent more recyclables so far this year than in 2013. That’s stuff that’s not going to the landfill.”

Casper has seen increases in its recycling program, Langston said. Its residents recycled 35 percent more during the last seven years, which is about 10 percent of the town’s total waste.

But the city still isn’t ready for curbside. Recent surveys show resident support around 50 percent for amenity, she said.

Other towns may not have as much flexibility in the next few years as recycling becomes more about the bottom dollar than saving trees.

Reach Assistant Content Director Christine Peterson at 307-746-3121 or christine.peterson@trib.com. Follow her on Twitter @PetersonOutside.

 

 

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. MamaLiberty
    Report Abuse
    MamaLiberty - August 24, 2014 8:12 am
    None of this makes any sense to me. If recycling is go wonderful and
    cost effective, why would the state pay 75% of the costs in some
    cases... which, of course, come out of the same people anyway in the
    end. Why is "RENEW" closing? Why didn't RENEW accept anything but paper
    and aluminum cans? Why is there no place to take even truly dangerous
    things like batteries. What in heck are we supposed to do with them?

    I think there's still a lot of completely empty land in Wyoming too.
    It's not as if this is New Jersey. And hauling trash from Sundance to
    Gillette or Casper seems insane to me.

    Burn the paper, compost the garbage, reuse bags and bottles yourself where possible. That makes more sense to me. And buy in bulk where you can to reduce the excess packaging. That would probably reduce the trash hauled away far more than any of this expensive alternative.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Most Popular

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers