Tower

City orders senior high-rise to upgrade fire system

2012-09-14T06:00:00Z 2013-01-04T18:08:10Z City orders senior high-rise to upgrade fire systemBy JOSHUA WOLFSON Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

Casper fire officials gave management at a downtown senior high-rise until year’s end to install an automatic fire sprinkler and alarm system in the building, according to letter released Thursday by the city.

Skyline Towers’ existing fire system is more than 20 years out of date. If apartment managers don’t replace it with a modern system, the city would be forced to serve residents with eviction notices.

Four local philanthropic groups have already pledged to help the nonprofit group that operates the building pay for the $250,000 upgrade. The city of Casper may also contribute money from a federal block grant program.

The United Way, which is facilitating the fundraising effort, is talking with additional philanthropic groups and hopes to have funding for the project in place by the end of next week, said Executive Director Mike Burnett.

“This is something you can’t allow to fail,” he said. “It’s serving a huge need for the community.”

Skyline Towers provides affordable housing to about 120 seniors. Many qualify as low-income under federal guidelines.

The existing fire system dates to 1969, when the tower was built. It consists of a pipe system that firefighters can access on each floor. There are smoke alarms in each apartment, and in the hallways, according to building management.

The system is not automated. Firefighters would have to turn the water on and hook their hoses to the pipes, Burnett said.

Under the existing system, a fire could have disastrous results, Casper Fire-EMS Division Chief Mark Harshman wrote in a Thursday letter to tower officials.

“I cannot in good conscience allow this situation to continue any longer,” he wrote. “It is my duty to insure the life safety of your tenants and employees, and is my first and foremost consideration in this matter.”

Harshman gave Skyline until Oct. 27 to provide detailed plans for an automatic sprinkler and alarm system. The system must be installed by Jan. 1.

Skyline’s management was first notified in 1991 that it should install a new fire system to bring the building up to code. The project was postponed over the years as board members and fire officials came and went, explained Douglas Thomas, vice chairman of the Skyline board of directors.

“Some things probably got lost in communication or tabled,” he said. “Now it has come to a head and we need to do something and move forward with it.”

Skyline expects to use $100,000 from its own reserves to help fund the project, but doesn’t have the money to cover the entire cost of construction. Thomas anticipates the board will raise rent by 10 to 15 percent next year to replenish its reserves.

Rent is currently set at $370 a month, including utilities.

The McMurry Foundation, Blue Envelope, the Zimmerman Family Foundation and a local foundation that asked to remain anonymous would contribute a combine $75,000. The City Council will be asked to give $25,000 in community development block grant money.

“We recognized it as a dire need,” Susie McMurry said Thursday at a meeting to discuss the situation. “We absolutely have to help our senior citizens in our community.”

The United Way is also working with Skyline to address some of the group’s long-term financial issues, Burnett said.

Contact Joshua Wolfson at 307-266-0582 or at josh.wolfson@trib.com. Visit http://trib.com/news/opinion/blogs/wolfjammies to read his blog. Follow him on Twitter @joshwolfson.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. nckwfan
    Report Abuse
    nckwfan - September 14, 2012 9:49 pm
    thanks...
  2. wyobear
    Report Abuse
    wyobear - September 14, 2012 9:27 pm
    To nckwfan; Your question is a valid one, at least on the surface. House of Hope was a project that had just started, it was not an established non-profit, in fact their focus and service seemed to change during their short existance. They seemed to be operating by the seat of their pants, without a clear business plan. They came to existence and started operations under the cloak of darkness and were not very transparent in their operating structure. The building in question did not belong to them and their use of it was not guaranteed, in fact , there was nothing to protect the donors investment. The owner of the property could sell it for a profit once the improvements to the property were made.
    Skyline Towers has been in existence for 43 years. The property is owned by the non profit and they are committing the property will continue to serve the community for many years to come.
    I think it is reasonable to question why the response between these two issues is so different. But when each one is looked at in detail it is clear that they are two very different issues.
  3. nckwfan
    Report Abuse
    nckwfan - September 14, 2012 6:49 pm
    Wow, I think it's great that our local community is rallying around this place to get them up to code. But my question is ( you're ahead of me aren't you) where were these philanthropists and local officials when the House of Hope for the homeless needed to update their fire code? Just something to think about...
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers