State of Wyoming, BLM launch pipeline corridor plan

2012-05-15T20:30:00Z 2012-05-16T08:44:06Z State of Wyoming, BLM launch pipeline corridor planBy TOM MORTON Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

The past few decades may well have been a geologic eon for pipeline evolution.

When Brian Jeffries started in the oil business more than 30 years ago, engineers would assemble some topographic maps and chart a route from its start to its finish, he said Tuesday.

The company would send surveyors with construction experience to the field, then commence the project, said Jeffries, executive director of the Wyoming Pipeline Authority.

That dinosaur is extinct on federal lands.

“Instead of the engineers deciding where they’d like to put it and the surveyors finalizing it, you go through a process of reviewed land use and the competing use of the land, and you come to a determination of where it’s allowed to go,” Jeffries said.

That’s because the U.S. Department of Interior’s Bureau of Land Management looks at sage grouse, raptor nests, soil and topography erosion, scenery, historic trails, agriculture, mining, motor travel restrictions, wilderness study areas, backcountry byways and more.

In their efforts to consider all land uses, the 10 BLM offices in Wyoming have acted independently in determining potential underground pipeline corridors, and sometimes they don’t align with corridors determined in neighboring BLM districts.

“We have this amazing mismatch of pathways,” Jeffries said. “Correcting the gaps isn’t easy.”

That frustrates businesses interested in sending carbon dioxide to old oil fields to recover oil that conventional methods could not reach, he said.

Gov. Matt Mead recently called for the Wyoming Pipeline Authority, in conjunction with the University of Wyoming’s School of Energy Resources and the Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute, to work with the BLM to establish a unified plan for pipeline corridors for CO2 transmission.

CO2 could help recover between 800 million and 2 billion barrels of oil in the Big Horn Basin, said Rob Hurless of the UW School of Energy Resources and Mead’s energy adviser.

Companies wouldn’t need to use the corridors established in this statewide effort, but it would help them save time in the permitting process, Hurless said.

While data collection has begun, Jeffries said the Pipeline Authority will be filing a National Environmental Protection Act application. The process could take between three and five years to complete, but it would save companies years in their future permitting processes, he said. NEPA dictates the federal environmental review process for this project, just like other energy projects on federal lands.

No BLM representatives apparently attended the Pipeline Authority’s meeting at the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission on

Tuesday in Casper.

But the bureau anticipates working with the state to fix the problems for CO2 pipelines, said state BLM spokeswoman Beverly Gorny.

Some BLM offices already are revising their corridors, Gorny said. “They are looking at edge-matching the resource issues.”

After the Pipeline Authority meeting, Duane Zavadil of the Bill Barrett Corp. said he knew of no other state working with the BLM to create a unified system of pipeline corridors.

“Wyoming is very progressive in these public lands issues,” Zavadil said.

Reach Tom Morton at 307-266-0592, or at

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers