U.S. Supreme Court decision opens opportunities for Wyoming juvenile murder convicts

2013-08-21T08:00:00Z 2013-08-21T10:42:05Z U.S. Supreme Court decision opens opportunities for Wyoming juvenile murder convictsBy MEGAN CASSIDY Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

A Casper man convicted of murder as a juvenile may have a way out of life imprisonment. If he is successful, other Wyomingites in similar circumstances may follow him.

The U.S. Supreme Court last year abolished mandatory life sentences for juveniles in a case called Miller v. Alabama. Local attorneys are asking the Wyoming Supreme Court whether this ruling would apply to in-state cases retroactively, after a convicted juvenile killer has been sentenced.

Edwin “Ike” Mares was 16 on Nov. 30, 1993, the day he and three other teenagers broke into a residence on West 15th Street in Casper. The ringleader, Victor Madrid, had always wanted to burglarize the house.

The group waited until the home’s resident left for dinner to sneak in, but Madrid was surprised by another woman coming out of the bathroom.

Madrid stabbed 76-year-old house guest Velma Filener repeatedly in the chest, back, side and arm. Mares witnessed the vicious attack, but claims he took no part in it and implored Madrid to just leave. According to a recent memorandum, there was “no indication or finding that Mares harmed anyone or even possessed a weapon.”

In June 1995 he was convicted of felony murder and sentenced to life in prison.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2012 that mandatory life sentences without parole for juveniles are cruel and unusual punishment. The Miller v. Alabama ruling states that “children are constitutionally different from adults for purposes of sentencing. Because juveniles have diminished culpability and greater prospects for reform … they are less deserving of the most severe punishments.”


Mares participated by phone in a Tuesday meeting in Natrona County District Court and was represented in person by defense counsel Dianne Courselle and Graham Hersh from the University of Wyoming School of Law.

Blonigen recently filed a motion to ask the Wyoming Supreme Court two questions: Would the Miller standard be applied retroactively to Wyoming cases; and what standard should be applied to determine whether the case has retroactive effect?

In a later interview with the Star-Tribune, Blonigen explained that the second issue calls into question the respect for finality of a previous judgment.

“Will this new Supreme Court case apply to cases that are decades old?” he said. “The issue is, how will we balance this out?”

Natrona County District Judge Catherine Wilking on Tuesday certified both questions, which pushed them straight to the Wyoming Supreme Court, therein bypassing a ruling of her own.

Gov. Matt Mead in February signed a state law that would end mandatory life sentences for juveniles, giving them a chance at parole after serving for 25 years. The state Legislature, though, did not write the law to apply retroactively.

The law does not eradicate life sentences for juveniles entirely, but impels courts to consider cases individually. A judge may take maturity level and the juvenile’s previous record into consideration.


Blonigen said there are other several inmates in Wyoming who are waiting to see how Mares’ case turns out to determine whether their life sentences could be retroactively reviewed as well. 

There are currently six other Wyoming inmates who are serving life sentences for crimes committed while they were juveniles, according to information provided by the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office: James Browning, Thomas Rivera, James Wiley, Jon Roderick, Jon Sides and Robin Sanders.

Even before the Miller decision, the nation was trending toward limiting mandatory life-imprisonment sentences for minors, said Jennifer Horvath, staff attorney with the state branch of the American Civil Liberties Union. Some legislatures were banning life without parole; some courts were decreasing the use of the sentence.

The national trend after the Miller ruling favors more opportunities for parole, she said. The ACLU supports court and legislative decisions that give juveniles an opportunity for rehabilitation.  

“We don’t think it makes sense to send kids to die in prison,” she said. “We believe that children can be rehabilitated, and that courts and society should recognize that.”

Reach crime reporter Megan Cassidy at 307-266-0534 or megan.cassidy@trib.com. Follow her on Twitter @meganrcassidy.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. hummthinkuknow
    Report Abuse
    hummthinkuknow - August 28, 2013 7:10 pm
    I just want people to know that the cops went off of a dream that was told to them that victor had. my friend told cops about his dream and then they started saying that victor, ike, and the others where at fault. they found 7 finger prints in the house hold and surprisingly none of those prints were any of the kids that were convicted of this crime. the truth is none of them did this crime some one just had to take the fall. the killer still out there that what you should be worried about. honestly I really hope that people realize that innocent people are convicted daily for things like this just to give the town closure.
  2. Zebra9921
    Report Abuse
    Zebra9921 - August 24, 2013 12:54 am
    Let him rott....terrible crime he was a part of.
  3. Moore
    Report Abuse
    Moore - August 22, 2013 8:09 pm
    I would like to see things get over-turned for this guy. He was in the home during a murder, but he didn't do it. 16 is a stupid age and I'm not sure a punishment of life in prison is appropriate for someone who only had intentions of robbing a house. They said they thought the house was completely vacated.
  4. ken
    Report Abuse
    ken - August 21, 2013 8:35 am
    Really... This guy should stay locked up just for making himself that ugly.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers