Get ready, Republicans: The Tea Party has an energy angle

2011-09-12T13:57:00Z 2011-09-12T14:08:16Z Get ready, Republicans: The Tea Party has an energy angleBy Jeremy Fugleberg, Star-Tribune energy reporter Casper Star-Tribune Online

It's conventional wisdom that Republicans and Democrats broadly differ in their opinions on renewable energy and climate change policy.

But a recently released study shows that members of the Republican Party's Tea Party faction differs from their more mainstream comrades on energy and environmental issues. This is something to watch as different factions of the Republican Party work to shape the party platform for the 2012 elections.

The Tea Party is not a big fan of policies that require electricity utilities to get some of their electricity from renewable sources, such as solar or wind, according to the study conducted by researchers at Yale and George Mason University.

Those renewable energy quotas are largely driving the wind energy development in the state of Wyoming, as producers work to harness our world-class wind and ship it to utilities in states with such requirements.

Republicans joined Democrats and Independents in supporting a requirement for utilities to produce at least 20 percent of their electricity from renewable sources, even if it cost the average household an extra $100 a year. A majority of Tea Party members opposed that policy, with 39 percent strongly opposing it.

Wyoming's uranium industry is on the rebound, with several large projects nearing completion and others in various stages of development. The state's uranium will provide fuel to existing U.S. reactors and those under development.

The Tea Party appears to be a relatively big supporter of domestic nuclear energy. Tea Party members support more nuclear plants and would even support construction of the facilities in their local area. Republicans would support more nuclear plants but not want one in their backyard.

On global warming, the difference between the Tea Party and the larger Republican party is fairly stark.

The Tea Party members strongly oppose an international treaty to cut carbon dioxide emissions, while a majority of Republicans (and Democrats and Independents) support such a plan.

Unlike Republicans, Tea Party members don't believe global warming is taking place, and they are more likely than Republicans to say they're very well informed and don't need more information about global warming.

All members of the political spectrum support funding more research into renewable energy sources and giving tax rebates to people who purchase energy efficient vehicles and solar panels.

The study was conducted by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication.

It was funded by three environmental groups: the Surdna Foundation, the 11th Hour Project, and the Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment. The study's funders could set off some alarm bells, but the study's methodology seems quite sound.

The Republican Party will have some interesting days ahead as it hammers out its positions on energy and environmental policy.

Keep an eye on this. Those policies will deeply impact Wyoming, particularly if a Republican challenger replaces Barack Obama in the White House.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick