Another economic opportunity for Wyoming

2013-05-24T05:00:00Z 2013-06-07T18:47:03Z Another economic opportunity for WyomingStar-Tribune Editorial Board Casper Star-Tribune Online
May 24, 2013 5:00 am  • 

There is a fantastic amount of lithium north of Rock Springs.

Good economic news for Wyoming will follow if even part of its potential can be tapped.

Lithium is a key component of batteries and electronic devices. It also plays a key role in lithium-ion batteries that store excess energy for later use in wind, solar and smart-grid technologies. In short, as the push to go green intensifies, so will the demand for lithium.

The find, projected by the University of Wyoming Carbon Management Institute to be upwards of 228,000 tons, is significant for energy development in the southwest corner.

In effect, this industry could aid the development of another and boost yet another.

n The state’s carbon sequestration efforts are focused in the same area, which could serve as a future storage site for carbon emissions produced by burning fossil fuels — primarily coal — at power plants.

n To store the carbon dioxide, the briny water in the Rock Springs Uplift would have to be removed from below the surface. The water in this uplift contains the lithium.

n A significant cost in desalinating the briny water is pressurizing it. The lithium-laced water near Rock Springs is so deep underground, officials expect its treatment costs to be less.

n Even so, extracting lithium from brines requires soda ash — long an abundant mineral in Sweetwater County.

The meeting of the minerals appears too good to be true, but could be a boon for Wyoming.

This interesting find would also help Wyoming diversify its energy and natural resources portfolio. As we’ve said before, in order for Wyoming’s economy to survive the natural boom-and-bust cycles of energy sectors, we must diversify. This appears to be an opportunity to do so.

Said Ron Surdam, director of the UW Carbon Management Institute: “It’s interesting how all the resources you need converge on the Rock Springs Uplift.”

As expected, the value of the find is being debated. Researchers peg it as high as $500 billion, based on current lithium values; the lone company to apply for leases thus far calls it “a shot in the dark.”

David Miller, a geologist and state representative, filed the leasing paperwork first and will likely get one of the first shots at developing the site. He’s opportunistically skeptical.

“The key is to let people explore,” he said.

We believe he has to be correct: We won’t know exactly how valuable and how realistic Wyoming’s store of lithium is until some groups start exploration.

Given the estimate range, anticipated increase in demand for lithium, and the impact on Wyoming, state officials are correctly taking a measured pace in processing applications.

“At this point,” Ryan Lance, director of the Wyoming Office of State Lands and Investments, said, “we just don’t know. Because we don’t know, we need to be very cautious.”

Wyoming has the potential to benefit from the find for decades to come, so it’s the right approach given so many moving parts.

But my, doesn’t it feel good to consider the potential?

Contact Assistant Managing Editor David Mayberry at 307-266-0633 or Read his blog at Follow him on Twitter@David_Mayberry.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. Salty Dawg
    Report Abuse
    Salty Dawg - May 25, 2013 9:25 am
    Economic opportunity? Sort of like the Budweiser plant fiasco?
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick