Slow down on changing the speed limits

2013-05-13T05:00:00Z Slow down on changing the speed limitsStar-Tribune Editorial Board Casper Star-Tribune Online
May 13, 2013 5:00 am  • 

While the intent of reducing speed limits on some Wyoming highways may be sincere, the Legislature is right to demand Wyoming Department of Transportation officials explain their changes in more detail.

This isn’t a case of micro-management by the Cheyenne crowd; it’s a case of bureaucrats justifying changes that on the surface do not make sense.

Speed limit changes on three highways — Highway 34 through Sybille Canyon, U.S. 26 over Togwotee Pass and U.S. 14/16/20 between Cody and Yellowstone — drew the attention of legislators.

Workers recently finished reconstruction work on all three roads. The new speed limit signs posted by WYDOT note speeds slower than before the work was done. You read that correctly: The speed limit on the damaged — and presumably less safe — roads was higher than on the wider, smoother — and presumably safer — reconstructed roads.

Said Rep. Kermit Brown, R-Laramie: “They spend incredible amounts of money, and then come out with a speed limit that just seems completely out of sync with the quality of highway they’re building.”

Brown unsuccessfully pushed two bills that would limit WYDOT’s ability to decrease highway speeds. However, he did help write the report requirement for WYDOT in the budget bill. The report is due by Sept. 1.

Specifically, WYDOT is required to admit if it lowers speed limits to meet federal guidelines or to make a positive impression on federal regulators (who give the thumbs-up or -down on projects that might cover environmentally sensitive federal land).

In other words: Explain your motivation before slowing Wyoming down. And really that’s the important thing. For an agency that takes its fair share of criticism (right or wrong), this is really a measure aimed at transparency. Maybe speed limits should be slower, but first, let’s have a conversation before the sign is placed.

The roads in question are in and near some of the state’s most sensitive areas, and there very well might be a need for drivers to proceed through them at a slower pace.

The environments are pristine, and wildlife protection needs play a role, too.

WYDOT chief engineer Delbert McOmie told the Star-Tribune’s Laura Hancock that the agency solicited comments from several environmental groups and government agencies when considering the pedal point.

“Even though the road looks flatter and wider than it was before — and it is — from a design standpoint, the new design standards, which have improved over the years, would have required an even wider, flatter roadway” to go faster, McOmie said.

Fair enough, but the public deserves the details.

And the sooner, the better.

Contact Assistant Managing Editor David Mayberry at 307-266-0633 or Read his blog at Follow him on Twitter@David_Mayberry.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. Sassy
    Report Abuse
    Sassy - May 14, 2013 9:51 am

    This breed of Legislator- does not include "appointed commissions" or the members of the public in their decisions. They simply tell the public what they have done for them in "their" best interest.
  2. Sassy
    Report Abuse
    Sassy - May 14, 2013 9:47 am
    Kermit Brown must own property near Sybille Canyon...
  3. pappy
    Report Abuse
    pappy - May 13, 2013 7:52 am
    you are wrong this is very much the Cheyenne crowd meddling in something that was agreed to long ago. WYDOT has an appointed commission and Director to make these kinds of decisions. It's not necessary for the legislature to second guess there efforts. If they wanted in put then they should have been involved during the process. Two of the roads ( Towgotee and Cody had EIS's done for the portions on the USFS. Lower speeds were mitigation to reduce impacts to wildlife. The roads were made as wide as they were because WYDOT said that was the standard they had to be built to??? You and Rep Brown would know this with just a little checking but instead you want to stir the pot and justify your jobs.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick