Why vote against rape amendment?

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Editor:

In 2005, Jamie Leigh Jones was gang raped by her co-workers while working for Halliburton/KBR in Baghdad. Instead of getting help from the company she was locked in a shipping container for 24 hours without food, water or a bed and warned that if she left Iraq for medical treatment she would lose her job (and her case was not an isolated case).

Jones was released only after someone helped her get word to her father in Houston, who got a congressman to intercede.

Jones was prevented from bringing charges against KBR because her employment contract stipulated that sexual assault allegations would only be heard in private arbitration.

What kind of justice is that? And why didn't the U.S. attorney general bring rape charges against the rapists?

Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., sponsored an amendment to the 2010 Defense Appropriations bill that would withhold defense contracts from companies like KBR if they restrict their employees from taking workplace sexual assault cases to court.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., called the amendment a political attack on Halliburton Co. They protect Dick Cheney's deferred payments on war contracts.

Thirty Republican senators, all men, including Wyoming's two senators, John Barrasso and Mike Enzi, voted against Sen. Franken's amendment. But it passed 68 to 30.

The people of Wyoming should know about this. And ask our two senators why they opposed legislation to crack down on gang rape.

AL HAMBURG, Torrington

Print Email

Sponsored Links

 
Sponsored by:

Connect with Us

TribTown