Scientist studies CO2 link to quakes in Yellowstone

Scientist puts theory to the test with study of Yellowstone pine tree rings
2010-12-13T01:00:00Z Scientist studies CO2 link to quakes in YellowstoneBy BRETT FRENCH - The Billings Gazette Casper Star-Tribune Online
December 13, 2010 1:00 am  • 

Is Yellowstone National Park losing steam?

That's what U.S. Geological Survey scientist Bill Evans is hoping to find out by studying the rings of lodgepole pine trees in the park.

Although scientists can't measure how much steam is released by the park's famous geothermal features, it can find a record of carbon dioxide that derives from magma and is released into the atmosphere after it is trapped in trees. Scientists are fairly certain that the release of steam and CO2 are coupled, Evans said. Yellowstone is a huge producer of carbon dioxide, an estimated 45,000 tons a day.

With trees that date back to the 1500s found near Mammoth Hot Springs, Evans is hoping to find definitive proof of whether carbon dioxide output has remained the same, gone up or settled down.

In the December issue of the U.S. Geological Society of America, Evans was the lead author of a study detailing the first research into the tree ring-carbon dioxide link in Yellowstone. The study began about five years ago in the Mud Volcano thermal area north of Yellowstone Lake.

Specifically, Evans was looking for a tie between the release of carbon dioxide and an earthquake swarm that took place in 1978.

"We consider the Yellowstone caldera restless," Evans said. "The caldera floor goes up and down. Some of the nice lake basins are explosion craters. In the USGS, we worry about being able to recognize what leads up to one of these explosions.

"We don't know exactly what to look for," he said, although scientists figure that indicators may include the release of carbon dioxide, increasing seismic activity or increased heat at the earth's surface.

"The 1978 seismic swarm was associated with a huge cloud of carbon dioxide," Evans said, prompting the theory that the upflow of high-pressure CO2 was the cause of the seismic swarm, not intrusion by magma. Water and the flexing of the earth's brittle crust over the Yellowstone caldera are also causes of earthquake swarms.

With mobile CO2 monitors, scientists in the future can set up in the vicinity of earthquake swarms to measure carbon dioxide output. Studies in other countries, such as Japan, have shown a CO2-seismic swarm link. Evans thinks that tree core samples can tell scientists where and how to monitor in Yellowstone.

"If we can identify some seismic events that are caused by carbon dioxide, then we can look for the characteristics of it that are identified in the next swarm," Evans said.

Co-authors of the study were USGS scientists Deborah Bergfeld and John McGeehin, John King of Lone Pine Research in Bozeman, Mont., and Hank Heasler of Yellowstone National Park.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers