Brothel owner appeals child porn conviction in Wyoming

2010-12-15T00:00:00Z Brothel owner appeals child porn conviction in WyomingThe Associated Press The Associated Press
December 15, 2010 12:00 am  • 

CHEYENNE -- A former Nevada brothel owner is asking a federal judge in Wyoming to set aside his convictions on charges of possessing and transporting child pornography.

David Burgess, who's in his mid-50s, filed a lawsuit last week, claiming his original lawyer did an inadequate job in his defense. He is seeking a new trial.

Burgess is a member of a Nevada chapter of the Hells Angels and former owner of the Old Bridge Ranch, a legal brothel near Reno, Nev. He's serving a 15-year prison sentence.

U.S. District Judge Alan Johnson of Cheyenne, who presided over Burgess' trial, last week ordered federal prosecutors to file a response to Burgess' claims. He has retained San Francisco attorney Tony Serra, a nationally prominent civil rights lawyer who gained fame defending members of the Black Panthers and other groups in the 1960s.

Jim Barrett, assistant federal public defender, declined to comment on Burgess' claims he failed to provide an adequate defense at trial.

A federal appeals court already has upheld Burgess' convictions.

"There can be no doubt, let alone a grave doubt, that Burgess knowingly possessed child pornography as he traveled from Nevada into Wyoming," a three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court in Denver stated last year when it upheld his convictions.

The U.S. Supreme Court also has declined to review Burgess' case.

John Powell, spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Cheyenne, said it's not uncommon for defendants to appeal sentences and that many defendants claim their defense lawyers were ineffective.

"Our office feels confident that the original conviction and sentence was appropriate, that Mr. Burgess received appropriate and effective counsel from the public defender's office and we will vigorously defend the conviction throughout Mr. Burgess' appeal," Powell said.

Federal prosecutor Jim Anderson said at trial that investigators found child pornography on computer hard drives they confiscated from Burgess' motor home after a state trooper pulled him over in western Wyoming in July 2007.

Burgess claims in his new lawsuit that Barrett failed to prepare for the trial and was unprepared to give an opening statement to the jury at the beginning of the case.

Burgess also claims that Barrett failed to interview witnesses, investigate others who might have placed the pornography on the hard drives or look into the involvement of federal officials who alerted state authorities to watch for Burgess.

His lawsuit claimed Barrett openly showed his dislike for Burgess in front of the jury, calling the public defender "the one person who is supposed to be defending him cannot even stand to look at him or speak to him."

"The jury was likely predisposed to dislike the defendant, who is a member of the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club, a brothel owner, a drug user and accused of possessing a nearly unimaginable amount of child pornography," the lawsuit said.

Kate Hallinan, a San Francisco lawyer who works with Serra, said Burgess' friends and family -- not the Hells Angels -- retained Serra to work on the case.

"There was a great deal of evidence available that showed his innocence, or at least definitely shed reasonable doubt on the situation, and really none of it was put before the jury," Hallinan said. "... Those questions weren't brought in front of the jury. And so that's what we think that Mr. Burgess deserves -- to have all the facts, all the evidence shown so that he can get a fair trial."

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses