Expansion's death leaves poor without Medicaid or insurance subsidies

2013-02-10T11:30:00Z 2013-09-24T19:26:04Z Expansion's death leaves poor without Medicaid or insurance subsidiesBy JOSHUA WOLFSON Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

In the fall of 2011, doctors found a fist-sized tumor lodged near Tory Bodily’s spine.

The tumor wasn’t cancerous, but doctors worried it could leave her paralyzed if it grew larger. Removing the mass would require surgery.

At the time, Bodily was a 22-year-old nursing assistant working at a cash-strapped Casper nursing home. Her employer had cut back on her hours and she couldn’t afford health insurance, which would have consumed about half her paycheck.

The surgery succeeded and Bodily recovered. But she was left with $90,000 in medical debt.

“I had no options,” she said. “I had to get the surgery.”

Before the operation, Bodily applied for Medicaid, a government health program that covers the poor and medically needy. They told her she didn’t qualify because she made too much money, was single and didn’t have any children.

Bankruptcy became her only option. It came with consequences.

“My credit is shot,” she said. “I have no chance of buying any kind of house or getting a truck loan or anything like that. So that’s pretty devastating.”

Bodily is one of roughly 83,000 people without health insurance in Wyoming. Like her, many have jobs that don’t earn enough to buy coverage.

The federal health reform law passed by Congress in 2010 included a provision that enabled the state to extend Medicaid to about 17,600 low-income adults in Wyoming. But lawmakers, wary of federal promises to fund the expansion, voted it down last month.

Wyoming lacks an alternative that could significantly reduce the size of its uninsured population, according to interviews with people who are familiar with the state’s health care system. Nor does it have a proposal to address the $200 million in uncompensated care that hospitals provide each year — costs that ultimately result in higher bills for people with insurance.

For the time being, Bodily and others like her are left with few options. They can’t afford health insurance and don’t qualify for government coverage. And in the aftermath of the Supreme Court ruling on health reform, many will miss out on subsidies when an insurance exchange launches in Wyoming next year.

“We just have to admit it. Some of our neighbors are subsisting on such low incomes that they cannot buy insurance,” said Dan Neal, who represents the Wyoming Coalition for Medicaid Expansion. “That is the reality of their life. Without this safety net of Medicaid expansion, they are going to be left out in the cold.”

Optional expansion

Medicaid already provides coverage to about 77,000 people in Wyoming. It’s expected to cost the state $560 million during the current, two-year budget cycle, making it among the state’s most expensive programs.

Federal health reform requires states to extend Medicaid coverage to more low-income people. However, a ruling last year by the U.S. Supreme Court allowed states to reject certain parts of the expansion.

For Wyoming, optional expansion would have made poor childless adults eligible for Medicaid based on income alone. It would have also extended eligibility to more low-income parents. Combined, those expansion groups represent more than 20 percent of the state’s uninsured population.

At the Downtown Clinic in Laramie, expansion would have provided coverage for at least half of its 400 patients, said Executive Director Sarah Gorin. The clinic offers primary care to poor people who lack insurance.

Rejecting the expanded program means more misery for Gorin’s clients, she said. They already have a difficult time obtaining specialty care, and a number can’t work due to health problems.

“Nothing changes for them basically … it means more time without care for people without access to it,” she said.

When they rejected expansion, lawmakers argued they needed more time to understand health reform’s implications. Gorin has little sympathy for that sentiment.

“I wouldn’t react so strongly if there was an alternative,” she said. “But I don’t see the point in waiting when there is nothing else to offer.”

Many lawmakers remain skeptical that federal officials will honor their promise to fund at least 90 percent of the cost of growing Medicaid. They worry that committing to the program would eventually force the state to choose between spending millions more on health or booting thousands off the expanded Medicaid rolls.

“I don’t want to make promises that I can’t keep,” said Sen. Bill Landen, a Casper Republican who voted against expansion. “I think it would be worse for us to put 30,000 people on coverage we can’t sustain.”

Voting down expansion didn’t end the state’s health care problems, Landen acknowledged. But he contends it’s better to ensure the state can support an expanded program before acting.

“It is okay to put this in neutral for now, find out what the ramifications are, and then sort them out as we go,” he said.

No subsidies

Next year, the federal government will launch a health insurance exchange — a sort of online marketplace for consumers shopping for coverage. Many people who use the exchange will qualify for subsidies based on their income, making it easier for them to buy insurance.

But subsidies won’t be available to some of the people who lost out on coverage when lawmakers defeated Medicaid expansion. Ironically, it’s because they don’t earn enough.

Congress designed the subsidies to cover people whose incomes are at or above the federal poverty level. That translates to at least $23,500 for a family of four. People below that level would have been covered through Medicaid expansion.

However, the expansion, at least for childless adults and most low-income parents, isn’t going to happen in Wyoming. So members of that group who earn less than federal poverty level will now miss out on both Medicaid and the exchange subsidies.

Health officials aren’t certain exactly how many people are stuck in the gap between the two programs.

“I’m not sure they are going to have meaningful options at all,” said Mike Fier-berg, a spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. “Obviously, they will be able to go into the marketplace and purchase a policy. However, without the [subsidy], that policy might be unaffordable to them.”

Congress, when it wrote the federal reform law, didn’t anticipate a Supreme Court ruling that allowed states to opt out of Medicaid expansion, Fierberg said. The law would have to be revised in order to change who can receive the exchange subsidies.

Given the current composition of the Congress, that seems unlikely.

“We have to obey the law,” Fierberg said. “It’s Wyoming that decided what to do about it. Under the Supreme Court decision, that is their right to do so. But we can’t change the law.”

The federal government issued regulations last month that will offer some measure of help for people stuck in the gap between Medicaid and exchanges subsidies. According to the new rules, they won’t be penalized under the individual mandate for lacking health insurance.

Contact Joshua Wolfson at 307-266-0582 or at Visit to read his blog. Follow him on Twitter @joshwolfson.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. jc45
    Report Abuse
    jc45 - February 11, 2013 4:32 pm
    This is another example of our legislature putting their hatred of the President and their right wing ideology ahead of the health and welfare of Wyoming’s tax paying residents.
  2. Sappho
    Report Abuse
    Sappho - February 11, 2013 3:53 pm

    Watch this. Instead of saving money ($47 million dollars and helping those who need the help the most- the WORKING poor) the state is actually losing money to the tune of $12 million dollars a year on medicaid because the politicians 'don't trust that the gov't will continue to pay the same bills it's been paying for ages' add to that the lack of medical care for a majority of it's residents and I would say this is legislative failure at the highest level. The old, rich dudes in legislature are so busy worrying about what people might think than what is RIGHT.

  3. Strider
    Report Abuse
    Strider - February 11, 2013 9:35 am
    I'm amazed there are no other comments in more than 24 hours since this story was published. My thoughts on the legislature's failure : this is legislative malpractice. They have ignored the needs of Wyoming citizens. They have ignored the voices of Wyoming healthcare professionals, including the Wyoming Hospital Association. They have ignored their own staff in the Health Department who have pointed out the the Medicaid expansion will save Wyoming citizens millions of dollars. The legislature is proving itself too stupid to govern Wyoming.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses