Federal court case in Wyoming examines election law and free speech

2012-09-13T07:00:00Z 2013-08-22T06:39:30Z Federal court case in Wyoming examines election law and free speechBy LAURA HANCOCK Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online
September 13, 2012 7:00 am  • 

For a minute, forget your political stripe and read the copy for the following ad:

“President Obama opposes the Government Litigation Savings Act. This is a tragedy for Wyoming ranchers and a boon to Obama’s environmentalist cronies. Obama cannot be counted on to represent Wyoming values and voices as President. This November, call your neighbors. Call your friends. Talk about ranching.”

Does that sound like a campaign ad or an issue ad?

The answer could affect small, grassroots groups across the United States and their ability to exercise free speech.

That’s according to attorneys for a Wyoming group called Free Speech, who were in federal court in Casper on Wednesday, arguing before a judge that a section of federal election law needs to be thrown out.

Free Speech, with the Cheyenne-based Wyoming Liberty Group, wants the ads, including the rancher ad, to be considered issue ads instead of campaign ads.

Technically, ads for or against a candidate are “express advocacy.”

Any express advocacy speech would make small groups like Free Speech, which only has three members, fall under the rules of political action committees if they’ve raised $1,000, said Stephen Klein, an attorney for the Wyoming Liberty Group.

The Federal Election Commission has a host of rules for PACs, like requiring them to report expenses in 10 different categories monthly or quarterly, decline contributions from foreign donors and avoid working with political candidates.

Small groups cannot afford attorneys and accountants to help them follow such rules, which ultimately means they cannot exercise their First Amendment rights, Klein said.

Free Speech’s case ended up in the courtroom of U.S. District Court Judge Scott Skavdahl after Free Speech and the Wyoming Liberty Group concluded they couldn’t get clarity from the six-member FEC.

Free Speech submitted its ads to the FEC for an opinion on whether they would be considered express advocacy speech. At an April hearing in Washington D.C., the commission was split in its opinion of some of the ads — including the ranching ad.

Attorneys for Free Speech and the Wyoming Liberty Group decided the law on express advocacy needed to be thrown out and sought a preliminary injunction preventing the FEC from enforcing the express advocacy provision as part of a larger lawsuit on the matter.

The FEC sent attorneys from Washington D.C. to Casper to argue their side before Skavdahl.

“When there’s a 3-3 tie, you have a green light?” the judge asked about whether Free Speech could broadcast the ads.

“That’s right,” FEC attorney Erin Chlopak said.

However, the FEC could revisit the case later.

“It’s not a guarantee of immunity [to run the ad?]” Skavdahl said.

“There’s no guarantee,” Chlopak said.

Free Speech would like to broadcast their ads, especially the ranching ad, since the U.S. Department of Labor recently made changes to laws governing child labor on farms. Free Speech intended to spend about $1,000 for 60 radio airings of the ranching ad.

Skavdahl said he was aware that it’s an election season.

“I will do my most to render a timely decision,” he said.

Reach Laura Hancock at 307-266-0581 or laura.hancock@trib.com. Follow her on Twitter: @laurahancock.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. krallsa
    Report Abuse
    krallsa - September 13, 2012 10:24 pm
  2. carlover
    Report Abuse
    carlover - September 13, 2012 8:49 am
    get to know the liberty group/ they are speaheading the fight for property rights in this state. go to their web sight and watch one video of (zoning laws) protecting your property rights, and you will see whats behind alot of whats going on in casper. its happening in cheyenne as well.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick