Wyoming anti-gay marriage bills advance

2011-01-22T01:00:00Z 2011-01-23T08:50:25Z Wyoming anti-gay marriage bills advanceBy JEREMY PELZER - Star-Tribune capital bureau Casper Star-Tribune Online

CHEYENNE -- Legislation to prohibit recognition of same-sex marriages from outside Wyoming advanced further in the state House of Representatives on Friday.

A Senate committee also approved a proposed constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in the state, though not before amending it to potentially allow for civil unions.

By a voice vote, state representatives passed House Bill 74 on second reading; the bill must now pass a final vote next week before heading to the Senate, which appears supportive of the proposal.

The bill passed Thursday on first reading with support from 34 of 60 House members. Opponents of the bill were working Friday to get five lawmakers who initially voted for the legislation to switch their votes.

The Wyoming House has voted down similar legislation twice in recent years. But with many past opponents retiring or voted out of office in November, supporters have said they're optimistic they have the votes to pass the bill this year.

State Rep. Owen Petersen, R-Mountain View, the bill's sponsor, said the legislation is needed to resolve a conflict in Wyoming law, which defines marriage as a contract "between a male and a female person" but also recognizes any valid marriage performed outside the state. Other supporters have said the bill will help to hold back government intrusion into Wyoming traditions and culture.

Opponents said the bill is unnecessary, violates the rights of gays and lesbians to marry, and would create havoc for legally married out-of-state gay couples traveling in Wyoming.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the State Capitol, Senate Judiciary Committee members passed a proposed constitutional amendment banning gay marriage by a 3-2 vote on Friday.

Senate Joint Resolution 5 now heads to the full Senate for consideration. But even if the legislation passes the Senate, Thursday's vote on HB74 indicates there might not be the two-thirds support needed for the resolution to pass the House.

Before passing SJR5, committee members amended it to specify that civil unions and other marriage-like contracts wouldn't be covered under the proposed ban.

Contact capital bureau reporter Jeremy Pelzer at 307-632-1244 or jeremy.pelzer@trib.com

Bill Tracker

House Bill 74

* What the bill would do: Change state law to prohibit recognition of legal same-sex marriages performed outside Wyoming.

* The latest: The House passed the bill on second reading Friday.

* What's next: A final House vote on the bill is scheduled for Monday.

Senate Joint Resolution 5

* What the bill would do: Hold a statewide referendum in 2012 on a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

* The latest: The Senate Judiciary Committee passed the legislation 3-2 Friday and amended it to potentially allow for civil unions in Wyoming.

* What's next: The full Senate will take up the legislation next week.

House Bill 150

* What the bill would do: Establish civil unions in Wyoming.

* The latest: The bill was introduced and assigned to the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

* What's next: The committee will hear the bill next week.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers