Future of Wyoming Medicaid expansion appears more uncertain

2013-01-25T21:30:00Z 2013-01-31T20:21:04Z Future of Wyoming Medicaid expansion appears more uncertainBy JOSHUA WOLFSON Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

Bringing the Medicaid expansion bill to the Senate floor for a full debate will be difficult after it received negative recommendations from two legislative committees this week, the Senate’s vice president said Friday.

Normally, bills with a negative recommendation are treated as a low priority, said Sen. Eli Bebout, R-Riverton. But the bill’s chances of being heard are better than if one of the committees had voted to kill it altogether, he added.

Bebout’s response differed from that of Senate President Tony Ross, R-Cheyenne, who said earlier this week that he intended to have an open debate on the matter.

The legislation would expand Medicaid in accordance with the Affordable Care Act. It would extend government health coverage to roughly 28,000 poor and medically needy people in Wyoming, or about a third of the state’s uninsured population.

Last summer’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling gave states the ability to opt out of parts of the expansion. The legislation, Senate File 122, would commit Wyoming to both the optional and mandatory parts of the controversial health reform provision.

The Senate Appropriations Committee voted Friday to give the bill a negative recommendation. A Senate committee that oversees health issues made the same recommendation Wednesday.

While the bill has so far enjoyed little support in the Legislature, it’s backed by many state health care groups, including those representing hospitals and physicians.

A Wyoming Health Department study found that full expansion could save Wyoming $47 million over six years by allowing the state to spend less of its own money on other health programs. Opting out of the optional parts, in comparison, could cost the state $79 million.

The federal government has promised to initially cover the entire cost of covering newly eligible people. Eventually, the state would be required to pay 10 percent.

Opponents of the bill remain skeptical the federal government will honor its promises, especially given the deficit. Backers tried to alleviate this concern by including a trigger in the legislation that would allow the state to back out if the federal government doesn’t meet its obligations. But critics say it would be difficult for the state to reverse course once it offers an entitlement to a new group of people.

Supporters of expansion have other options should the Senate decide not to debate the bill. They could convince a House representative to sponsor mirror legislation, or attempt to have the matter included in the budget bill.

Regardless of what the Legislature decides, Wyoming must still expand coverage to roughly 10,600 newly eligible children and people who were already eligible for the program, but never enrolled.

Star-Tribune staff writer Laura Hancock contributed to this report.

Contact Joshua Wolfson at 307-266-0582 or at josh.wolfson@trib.com. Visit http://trib.com/news/opinion/blogs/wolfjammies to read his blog. Follow him on Twitter @joshwolfson.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. Pops
    Report Abuse
    Pops - January 26, 2013 8:41 am
    Wyoming obstructionism.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick