House Natural Resources Committee blasts federal agencies in Casper meeting

2013-09-04T18:00:00Z 2013-09-04T21:57:23Z House Natural Resources Committee blasts federal agencies in Casper meetingBy KYLE ROERINK Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online
September 04, 2013 6:00 pm  • 

Four U.S. representatives from Western states accused federal agencies and environmental groups on Thursday of using the Endangered Species Act to inhibit energy development, the agriculture industry and sportsmen throughout the country.

The members of the House Natural Resource Committee, all Republican, held a field hearing at the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission building in Casper. Wyoming U.S. Rep. Cynthia Lummis was joined by committee chairman Rep. Doc Hastings, Wash.; Rep. Doug Lamborn, Colo.; and Rep. Steve Daines, Mont. The members said the Obama administration is allowing special interest groups to use litigation to dictate how federal agencies prioritize endangered species listings.

They also pointed blame at the federal Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

“Allowing the fate of a species to be decided by (them) is not working,” Hastings said.

Lummis and her House colleagues believe states are better suited to control when and how animal populations can become listed or delisted as an endangered species. They also are looking for ways to mitigate the influence of environmental and conservation groups that they say use the act to their advantage.

The committee went to Billings, Mont., after Casper to hear another round of testimony. The committee is expected to collect the thoughts, concerns and proposed solutions from citizens and eventually write a bill that would amend the law. The act, which hasn't been renewed by Congress for 25 years, keeps being refunded every year. Many opposed to the law would like to see it defunded forever, but for some lawmakers in Washington it is a sacred cow, said Bob Wharf, executive director for the Wyoming Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife.

The push to reform the Endangered Species Act will take a hard look at how political science — as opposed to hard science — is used in determining the listing or delisting of species, members say.

There needs to be peer-reviewed scientific data — not statistics that are hand-picked by federal agencies — to buttress any move that would affect policy on federal land, Lummis said.  

“There’s a selective use of peer-review and non-review literature,” said Renee C. Taylor, owner of Taylor Environmental Consulting in Casper. “Agencies select non peer-reviewed literature and information provided by industry and private parties is often ignored.”

The committee invited Taylor, Wharf and three other Wyomingites who offered solutions and provided first-hand experience with how the act works in courtrooms, on ranches and in the wilderness.

Before their testimony, Lummis said Wyomingites are helping create new policies without the heavy hand of the federal government.

“It’s going to percolate up from the local level to the policy level,” she said.

Wyoming’s sage grouse conservation strategy was one example of how grassroots groups and state-level agencies worked together to provide a plan that appeased wildlife groups and fell within the guidelines of the Endangered Species Act, she said.

Wyoming's plan received approval from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and BLM. But the BLM’s support may not last forever, Taylor said. The 10th District Federal Court in Idaho recently advised the BLM to consider additional conservation strategies that don't take into account local economies, state conservation strategies and such multiple uses as ranching and recreating, she added.

The BLM is expected to make a decision by November.

Meanwhile, Hastings said only 2 percent of endangered species have been revived thanks to the law.

“What revives species are communities coming together to rally and protect them,” Wharf said.

One strategy touted by Lummis and others at the hearing is conservation banking, a technique used to restore, improve and preserve habitats.

Jeff Meyer, a managing partner of the Pathfinder Renewable Energy and Sweetwater River Conservancy, spoke about what he’s done on a nearly one-mile stretch at Horse Creek on the south side of Highway 220 by mile-marker 73.

Two years ago the area would flood after storms, leaving water in puddles instead of being used for livestock and providing a home for fish. The grass was brown, short and soggy. One year later, after Meyer’s work with the Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the creek flowed in its natural pattern, trees were planted and grass grew tall, he said.

Richard Garrett is an energy policy analyst for the Wyoming Outdoor Council. He said the Endangered Species Act benefits Wyoming as it currently stands. However, he agreed that ideas like Meyer’s are a pathway to consensus.

“Is there room for improvement? Yes. But we have to find better ways to work together,” he said.  

Jim Magagna, executive vice president of the Wyoming Stock Growers Association, said there needs to be more local involvement between landowners, the energy industry and other stakeholders in the state.

"If the act passed last week, we could do all the things we want to do," he said. "But over 40 years it's become the antithesis of its original intents."

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(6) Comments

  1. WyoBob
    Report Abuse
    WyoBob - September 05, 2013 9:35 am
    Chairman Hastings said at the hearing that the Democrats on the Natural Resources Committee were invited to attend and that they could have also could have called witnesses to testify. He also mentioned they were invited to the Billings, MT hearing as well. Guess they have no desire to hear from the people out west only to dictate how our money and resources can be allocated on their terms.
  2. WyoDem
    Report Abuse
    WyoDem - September 05, 2013 7:25 am
    Who will police the crooked and greedy?
  3. Cowboy Logic
    Report Abuse
    Cowboy Logic - September 05, 2013 6:30 am
    Please tell me you have some sort of resemblance to facts when your liberal mind goes off on a tangent about ranchers and prairie dogs? Obviously you’ve not been out on some BLM land in the past…oh ten years? Sounds more like a typical liberal that would rather covet another man’s belongs. So let’s make up a typical liberal lie about…let’s say prairie dogs or ranchers and have the government or EPA control the outcome of it.
  4. ken
    Report Abuse
    ken - September 04, 2013 5:01 pm
    What "pappy" fails to recognize is that the ultimate beneficiary of all the wasted time and litigation gets picked up by the consumers and taxpayers. The last one to leave always gets stuck with check. I will never understand how the liberal mind can process business as "bad" and expensive onerous, partisan big government as good. When it comes to government less is always better.
  5. Uinta
    Report Abuse
    Uinta - September 04, 2013 4:51 pm
    The Republicans sure should know about questionable science -- they're masters at it. As for controlling animal populations, the ranchers have eliminated "pests" such as prairie dogs to the extent that now prairie dogs are being considered for listing as an endangered species. Ranchers have never learned to share -- share the water and grass with wildlife, and share the land with other species. Ranchers recognize only one non-human species, whatever they are raising for profit, and they recognize only one type of human -- big hats. Turn the control of animal populations over to them -- you bet.
  6. pappy
    Report Abuse
    pappy - September 04, 2013 4:10 pm
    Lets see Lummis hand picks who gets to testify and then has the gall to say she wants all federal agency decisions based on science not politics. She better be careful. Politics have changed many good science based decisions. While I think some changes need to be made to the ESA and the ability of groups sue but she is clearly on the wrong track. Don't forget industry has the ability to sue also but they seldom do and when they do the seldom win.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick