Wyoming abortion bills focus on heartbeats

2013-01-13T11:00:00Z 2013-02-01T20:37:22Z Wyoming abortion bills focus on heartbeatsBy LAURA HANCOCK Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

A pair of bills before the Wyoming Legislature fixate on the heartbeat of the embryo or fetus before an abortion.

House Bill 97 would prohibit abortions if an embryo or fetus heartbeat is detected.

Senate File 88 would provide pregnant women the opportunity to listen to the fetus’ heartbeat before an abortion, among other things. Abortion rights advocates oppose the bills.


Rep. Kendell Kroeker, R-Evansville, a sponsor of HB97, said that detecting heartbeats is a unique way to look at life.

“It became clear that if a baby had a heartbeat, that seemed simple to me that it’s wrong to kill it,” he said.

The bill substitutes two words in current state law with four words. Current law says abortions are prohibited after the embryo or fetus has “reached viability.” The proposed law removes “reached viability” and adds “a detectable fetal heartbeat.

The bill defines a “legal heart beat” as “cardiac activity or steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart within the gestational sac that is detectable using standard medical equipment.”

Kroeker said that the idea for the bill just came to him, but it’s possible that he heard about it in the news.

Last year, Ohio had a similar measure. Anti-abortion groups told The Associated Press that they want all 50 states to require pregnant women to see and hear a heartbeat before an abortion.


In addition to presenting pregnant women the option of listening to the heartbeat, SF88 requires physicians to tell the women at least 24 hours before the abortion about the abortion method that will be used, medications, side effects and risks including “infection, hemorrhage, cervical or uterine perforation, danger to subsequent pregnancies, the increased risk of breast cancer and the death of the unborn fetus.”

Furthermore, a doctor would have to explain alternatives to abortion. Doctors would have to describe the age and anatomic and physiologic characteristics from ultrasound. Doctors would have to offer the woman the opportunity to view the ultrasound image. The woman would have to sign a document saying she’s been notified of her opportunity to view and hear the heartbeat.

If a pregnancy threatens the life of a woman, she would be able to receive an abortion immediately, the bill says.

Sponsor Rep. Leslie Nutting, R-Cheyenne, said she got the idea for the bill from a variety of places.

“This bill does not try to pit pro-choice against pro-life,” she said. “What it is doing is recognizing the right that these women, who need to have the most information available as they can so they can be informed in making what may be one of the most important decisions in their lives.”

Nutting, a retired nurse, said she has had personal experience with problematic abortions.

“My experience was with an abortion that was being performed and did have complications to that,” she said. “That was years ago. Since then, I worked mostly in the VA and most of the VA patients have been men.”

SF88 would require women to receive a list of clinics that provide free ultrasounds, and that concerns Sharon Breitweiser, the Wyoming executive director of the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League.

Most Wyoming clinics that offer free ultrasounds are run by religious groups that are anti-abortion, she said.

“There’s going to be a cost to the state to compile that list,” she said. “There’s no corresponding list for the Department of Health to provide a list of abortion providers or [free or reduced] contraception.”

Breitweiser disagrees with the 24-hour waiting period in the bill, as not respecting a woman’s wishes to end a pregnancy when she wants.

She said studies have debunked some of the medical concerns, such as an increased risk of breast cancer.


Many in the medical community declined to talk about fetus heart development, not wanting to be associated with the legislation. Travis Klingler, an obstetrician and gynecologist in Laramie, described basics without opining about either bill.

If physicians use a transvaginal ultrasound, they can hear a heartbeat about the fifth week of pregnancy, Klingler said.

In Kingler’s practice, women receive transvaginal ultrasounds free of charge as part of their prenatal care. However, that’s not standard with all doctors. Transvaginal ultrasounds require a probe in the vagina that sends out soundwaves.

“The only other way [to detect a heartbeat] would be with a handheld doppler,” Kingler said. “Probably the earliest you can detect it is around nine to 10 weeks.”

The courts

States are allowed to regulate abortion to an extent, said Stephen Feldman, a constitutional law professor at the University of Wyoming.

Although Roe v. Wade was the first U.S. Supreme Court decision to legalize most abortions, courts now refer to a 1992 case, Planned Parenthood vs. Casey, which modified the Roe decision.

“Basically the standard that the courts apply is the undue burden standard,” he said. “Under that approach, states can impose more restrictions than they used to be able to impose under Roe.”

But during a woman’s first and second trimesters, the courts have stated a woman can have an abortion free of laws that put an undue burden on that right.

“Thus, legislation that bans abortions once a fetal heartbeat is present would be unconstitutional under the undue burden test,” Feldman said.

However, the Senate bill has portions that could be upheld by the courts, Feldman said.

“Any type of consent form — like signing a consent form and waiting 24 hours — those have been upheld as constitutional,” Feldman said. “With regard to use of an ultrasound, if it’s requiring a woman to undergo an invasive ultrasound, from my perspective it would be unconstitutional.”

The stats

It’s tough to track the exact number of abortions in Wyoming.

Fewer than five abortions per year have been reported to the Wyoming Department of Health.

“We have had people thinking maybe that wasn’t an accurate number,” Health Department spokeswoman Kim Deti said. “Last year, the office sent out letters to physicians reminding them we’re supposed to report this.”

The Centers for Disease Control reported that in 2009, 782 abortions were performed for Wyoming residents outside the state — 475 were performed in Colorado, 160 in Montana and 128 in Utah.

Women may be leaving the state because there are not many abortion providers in Wyoming, Deti said.


HB97 has 11 sponsors: Kroeker, Reps. Donald Burkhart, R-Rawlins, Marti Halverson, R-Etna, Lynn Hutchings, R-Cheyenne, Allen Jaggi, R-Lyman, Mark Semlek, R-Moorcroft, Matt Teeters, R-Lingle, Nathan Winters, R-Thermopolis, and Sens. Dan Dockstader, R-Afton, Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, and Leslie Nutting, R-Cheyenne.

SF88 is sponsored by seven legislators: Nutting, Paul Barnard, R-Evanston, Curt Meier, R-LaGrange, and Reps. Hutchings, Jaggi, Tom Reeder, R-Casper, Stephen Watt, R-Rock Springs.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(6) Comments

  1. Marnie
    Report Abuse
    Marnie - January 24, 2013 9:04 pm
    Child? You're taking a big leap here in calling an embryo or fetus a child. You may believe it is such. I do not. I will assume that you won't be having an abortion. You may assume that I will take care of myself without your input. Luckily, as written, the law allows us each to make our own decision.
  2. vonu
    Report Abuse
    vonu - January 16, 2013 7:08 am
    Perhaps you could cite the right to murder ones child in either the Wyoming or United States Constitution? The right to keep and bear arms appears specifically in both, and is supported by the specification of militia membership in the former.
  3. vonu
    Report Abuse
    vonu - January 16, 2013 7:02 am
    Perhaps the bill should consider the right of the unborn not to be murdered.
    This could be accomplished by a simple resolution recognizing the humanity of an embryo or fetus with signs of life already recognized by medical science.
    Eugenics could be made a crime as well.
  4. jmso
    Report Abuse
    jmso - January 14, 2013 9:14 am
    Kendall Kroeker-R Evansville does not want anyone treading on his rights as a gun owner. Kendall, do not tread on my rights as a woman! Kendall Kroeker I am getting tired of reading your name.
  5. Marnie
    Report Abuse
    Marnie - January 13, 2013 3:30 pm
    Uhoh, looks like they're on to us. Yep, we go out of state. And with the help of our notoriously ignorant lawmakers, we will continue to. For more than just abortion though. You don't want to support women and their rights? We don't want to support you and your economy. Think about it.
  6. carlover
    Report Abuse
    carlover - January 13, 2013 12:19 pm
    i would please ask our state to not support this redicious bill, women have a right to their bodys and choices they make. please do not listen to the nut cases who think they should have control of my daughters body. with fewer then 5 cases of abortion in wyoming and less then 2 hundred in surrounding states, i do thiunk this is a legislation decision but a personal one, and a complete waste of time. people will do what they will if not here in another state. and i am pro abortion, for a number a reasons. one being accidents happen, birth contraol fails and rape happens. and without a means to deal with it legally, they will find back alley doctors to deal with it. do not get involved in a personal right, your jobs are to legislate issues of the state not of the personal nature.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers