Wyoming begins work on trimming water priorities

Wyoming Water Strategy Conference produces 50 initiatives; Mead will trim list to 10
2014-06-05T08:00:00Z Wyoming begins work on trimming water prioritiesBy TREVOR GRAFF Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

Wyoming residents have long known the importance of the more than 5.5 trillion gallons of water that flow through the state annually.

That fact was apparent Wednesday at the Wyoming Water Strategy Conference in Casper. State water officials met with ranchers and interest groups for the final event in a series of statewide comment gathering sessions.

Bud Christensen, a rancher from Gillette, said not much has changed concerning water policy since the time that his ancestors homesteaded the ranch he now operates in 1907.

“Technology is what it is,” Christensen said. “I agree Wyoming has good water laws. I won’t argue that, but they were good 100 years ago. Look at technology like sprinklers: They never had invented things like that when they were writing that law, and we need to upgrade, that’s all.”

Christensen’s son, Bob, a third-generation rancher on the family’s land near Glendo, said communication is critical for legislators and state officials in the final stages of the strategy’s drafting. He said educating those involved in settings like the conference would ease misconceptions surrounding several state water issues.

“We’ve actually talked to quite a few people today that are ready to make changes,” Bob Christensen said. “It’s like anything else you do: There’s a certain segment that keeps up and there’s a lot of them that don’t. There definitely needs to be some changes.”

State officials outlined more than 50 water initiatives in four main categories – development, management, conservation and watershed restoration. Topics ranged from the development of water storage reservoirs and hydroelectric power opportunities to changes in the policies governing Wyoming water rights.

The task of trimming this group to the final 10 initiatives that will make up the plan will ultimately fall on Gov. Matt Mead.

“There is no simple equation for how you decide what is most important,” said Nephi Cole, policy analyst in the Office of the Governor. “Ultimately, we have to look at the input piece, funding pieces, legislative priorities, local priorities and the partners that may be involved in each initiative."

Several people involved in the process voiced concern for the funding and implementation of the water strategy.

“It’s going to take us some time to put this together,” said Cole. “Having said that, this is a priority for the governor, and he wants to see action on water in months, not in years.”

Cole did not confirm an exact release date for the strategy but said it would be released promptly after public comment is compiled and analyzed. He said the state has not acted in such a comprehensive manner to develop statewide water policy in the past.

For those on the ground, that comprehensive communication is what creates change.

“The biggest thing we’re trying to do is make people understand that we’re trying to make some improvements for the better and get this thing done,” Bud Christensen said. “It can be tough.”

Reach general assignment reporter Trevor Graff at 307-266-0639 or Trevor.Graff@trib.com. Follow him on Twitter @TrevGraff.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. thehousemouse
    Report Abuse
    thehousemouse - June 05, 2014 1:32 pm
    forgive these people for they know not what they do...
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick