Wyoming fuel tax hike up for third vote in House on Friday

2013-01-17T22:00:00Z Wyoming fuel tax hike up for third vote in House on FridayBy JOAN BARRON Star-Tribune capital bureau Casper Star-Tribune Online

CHEYENNE -- State lawmakers took a wait-and-see approach to a pair of highway funding bills in the days before Friday's third and final vote in the House on a contentious fuel-tax hike.

House Bill 69 calls for a 10-cents-per-gallon increase in the state tax on gasoline and diesel. An amendment to reduce the hike to 5 cents was voted down during Thursday's second reading.

The legislation passed its first floor vote in the House on Wednesday, 34-26. The bill needs at least 31 votes Friday to clear the House and advance to the Senate.

Erin Taylor is the director of the Wyoming Taxpayers Association and head of a coalition of 17 organizations pushing for the tax increase.

Taylor said late Thursday afternoon that the coalition is "cautiously optimistic," but believes Friday's vote will again be close.

"People have made up their minds," she said of House members. "No one is waffling. No one is moving."

Rep. Mike Madden, R-Buffalo, has estimated that a family that drives 20,000 miles per year will see an $8 per month increase in fuel costs, or $96 per year. That's less than a prior estimate that the higher tax would mean an additional $114 per year for the average family.

Meanwhile, a bill that would divert mineral tax money to state and local roads and highways was put on hold Thursday in a Senate committee as a possible alternative to a higher fuel tax.

Senate File 109 would take 50 percent of the revenue from the 1 percent mineral tax that automatically goes into the state's Permanent Mineral Trust Fund.

The diversion would free an estimated $73 million per year for state highways, county roads and city streets.

The proposal to raise the fuel tax from 14 cents to 24 cents per gallon would raise about $71 million per year.

Gov. Matt Mead has supported the fuel tax hike, but has recommended the mineral tax diversion as an alternative.

Sen. Stan Cooper, R-Kemmerer, is the sponsor of SF109. He said his bill could be an "and/or bill," meaning it could be used instead of the higher fuel tax or could be combined with the tax bill to raise more money.

Cooper noted that the Wyoming Department of Transportation estimates it needs $134 million a year just to maintain the state's highways in their current condition.

"I think this is a good way because it doesn't add a tax to industry or the people in the state," Cooper said of the mineral severance tax bill.

Rep. Patrick Goggles, R-Ethete, is a co-sponsor of Cooper's bill. He said he has heard for years that state agencies need consistent sources of revenue to allow for long-term planning to make operations more efficient, which the legislation would accomplish.

No one opposed the mineral tax diversion during the committee meeting.

Ken Hamilton, representing the Wyoming Farm Bureau, said that while the organization is reluctant to support a higher fuel tax, it does want to help support highways.

Cooper's bill, he said, helps highways without going into the pockets of citizens who cannot afford it.

Mark Larson, of the Wyoming Petroleum Marketeers Association, said his group always realized it would take a "portfolio" of more than one source of revenue to meet state and local road needs.

Cooper said he would like to see the mineral tax bill pass out of committee.

"We don't know what's going to happen with the gas tax bill," he said.

But Sen. Cale Case, R-Lander, said it may be good to table the option for now.

Sen. Jim Anderson, R-Casper, said the committee should not let the fate of the fuel tax influence its decision on Cooper's bill.

The vote to table the bill until Jan. 23 passed 4-1, with Anderson casting the no vote.

The only other bill filed so far to help finance highways is Senate File 102, sponsored by Case. The proposal, which authorizes the highway commission to prepare for tolling on Interstate 80, was tabled in the Senate Committee on Transportation, Highways and Military Affairs on Wednesday evening.

Contact capital bureau reporter Joan Barron at 307-632-1244 or joan.barron@trib.com

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(5) Comments

  1. rigrat
    Report Abuse
    rigrat - January 18, 2013 9:34 am
    Oh boy,another tax, does that come with grease?
  2. Panhead
    Report Abuse
    Panhead - January 18, 2013 8:17 am
    True blu73, These polititions we elect lie to us to get elected, so why be honest about the gas tax increase. They think we are a bunch of know nothing hillbillies anyway.
  3. N3crix
    Report Abuse
    N3crix - January 18, 2013 7:58 am
    @blu73 I don't remember when a tax hike, didn't stay a tax hike either. Once the money starts coming in and is allocated, it is set in stone.

    Wyoming is not down (as per last vote) for anything that involves controlling guns, raising taxes and subsidized health care, now why aren't there people in streets and in restaurants talking about the "big bad govt raisin out taxes?"

    Because they are all too busy at Sportsman and Discount sports buying all the guns and ammo they can find...sometimes I wonder about the people here.
  4. blu73
    Report Abuse
    blu73 - January 18, 2013 6:26 am
    Please explain to me how adding a ten cent per gallon tax will not be passed on to every consumer? If sales tax goes up does not everyone pay it? I am unaware of any businesses absorbing sales tax so consumers do not have to pay. I have read many comments by Madden
    that this per gallon tax will not add ten cents per gallon at the pump. He has stated it will rise and then the price will drop and the supplier will absorb the tax. I am not an economist however over my life time I have not seen a tax added to anything that did not get passed on to the consumer.
  5. carlover
    Report Abuse
    carlover - January 18, 2013 3:12 am
    this bills should be killed for several reasons, one of which is the small transportation companys that are already straped with new insurance costs from obama care, and higher costs to fuel could kill many of these companies that are holding on by threads with inflated health care costs, insurances and now not just fuel, is on this bill but doubleing the costs of plates for vehicles. to me this is highway robbery. what happens when these smaller companies who can not abosorb the cost though frieght, or rate hikes. you put them out of business, then you put employees on the streets. the lobbiest who are pushing this bill have no dog in this fight to keep a company doors open. listen to wyoming small business owners who are at their tax rate limit. you can not slove all your problems by hiking taxes and hiking costs to own vehicles, weather 18 wheelers or a family car. why are you all squeezing the middle man and low income to the point they are entertaining leaving wyoming? for higher pay and for their businesses to survive they must seek out new souses of revenue for themselves, with only so many pieaces of a pie to be hard, and in order to make ends meet and pay payroll ,fuel plates, and now health care for their employees, seems this is just another way to eliminate the middle class. please vote no on both the fuel hike and the plates increase for wyoming families and small businesses.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Content Match

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers