Wyoming House speaker bundles social issue bills to save security costs

2013-01-13T10:00:00Z Wyoming House speaker bundles social issue bills to save security costsBy JOAN BARRON Star-Tribune capital bureau Casper Star-Tribune Online

Wyoming House Speaker Tom Lubnau plans to bundle the social issue bills to come before committee discussion over two days later this month to save on security costs.

Lubnau said he asked the committee chairmen in the House to keep their schedules open on Jan. 28. At that time, he will allocate the social issues bills for discussion on Jan. 28 and Jan. 29.

The speaker said increased security is needed most during committee hearings.

Lubnau said he also hopes to schedule all of the bills for debate on the House floor on the same days.

Senate President Tony Ross said he may do the same thing, although the Senate doesn’t have the same volume of bills as the House.

Lubnau said he decided on the bundling move when he found out the Legislature was paying for a lot of overtime for security to watch over the lawmakers for weeks at a time.

Shortening the discussion time and the need for additional security is a good step toward saving some public funds, he said.

The Legislature has always had additional surveillance by officers from Capitol Security in plain clothes during committee debates on sensitive social issue bills.

Those hearings can get very emotional, Lubnau said.

Additional security always has been used during committee discussions on firearms bills, although Lubnau said he believes that is silly.

Lubnau said only one anti-abortion bill has been filed so far, but there are multiple firearms bills in the hopper.

The number of social bills is likely to increase in the next two weeks.

“What’s driving the decision isn’t what the issue is, but what the community response is to the issue that require security,” Lubnau said.

He noted a change in the behavior of special interest groups over the years, particularly with social issue bills, that is concerning both him and Ross.

Both independently mentioned their concerns in their speeches to the House and Senate on Wednesday.

Lubnau said he received a death threat last year, while three or four other House members over the past year were threatened either with physical violence or death.

“That’s something we haven’t seen before,” he said.

The people or groups who made the threats, he said, have been identified to Capitol Building security officers.

Contact capital bureau reporter Joan Barron at 307-632-1244 or joan.barron@trib.com

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. Don Wills
    Report Abuse
    Don Wills - January 13, 2013 9:00 pm
    Security? I doubt that's the real reason for the two week delay.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Content Match

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers