Wyoming may look at ways to manage federal land

2013-02-26T22:00:00Z 2013-06-05T19:46:09Z Wyoming may look at ways to manage federal landBy LAURA HANCOCK Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online
February 26, 2013 10:00 pm  • 

Wyoming might soon eye ways the state could wrest land from the federal government, a measure that echoes the decades-old Sagebrush Rebellion.

House Bill 228, which provides $30,000 to pay for a study of the state’s options, awaits Gov. Matt Mead’s signature after gaining approval from the Legislature.

Critics call the study and the task force that will consider it a waste of money and time.

Task force members, to include lawmakers and others, would look at issues such as the loss of property tax revenues on federal lands, delays in permits because of federal laws and the management of wilderness.

“The study will look at what Wyoming can do to take primacy on the management of the public lands in Wyoming,” wrote bill sponsor Rep. David Miller, R-Riverton, in an email to the Star-Tribune.

The study essentially reignites the Wyoming front of the decades-old Sagebrush Rebellion, the movement from the 1960s-1980s in which many Western states tried through formal requests and state legislation to get the federal government to hand over land it owned within state borders.

Similar bills have been debated and passed in other Western states, said Shannon Anderson, an attorney for the Powder River Basin Resource Council, a Sheridan-based agricultural and conservation group.

“It’s been well-studied, it’s been well-debated,” she said. “We can’t make the federal government turn over its land to us. It’s not anything the state can do. It’s not worth spending the money to study.”

Anderson’s group was one of six that sent a letter to the Senate asking them to consider opposing the bill in a time of budget cuts and the “futility of trying to establish the legality of federal lands transfer.”

The other groups were the National Outdoor Leadership School, Wyoming Outdoor Council, Wyoming Wilderness Association, Equality State Policy Center and The Wilderness Society.

Anderson noted that the Joint Interim Minerals Committee heard testimony on Utah’s similar Land Transfer Act. But no Wyoming version of the bill came out of the committee.

Miller said critics have blown concerns about the study out of proportion.

“Of course their scare tactic is to say the bill is going to privatize Yellowstone and the other national parks, of course it is not,” he wrote in his email. “A simple conclusion of the study may be for the federal government to allow [oversight] by Wyoming agencies, instead of the federal government agencies. Much like we do on other issues.”

Reach state reporter Laura Hancock at 307-266-0581 or at laura.hancock@trib.com. Follow her on Twitter: @laurahancock.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(5) Comments

  1. pappy
    Report Abuse
    pappy - February 26, 2013 5:36 pm
    We whine about no money, the sky is falling, wecut agency budgets, raise taxes, but we can spend $30,000 on this! Almost every state in the west has tried this and lost, why are we any different. The height of stupidity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting to get a different result. But then we are talking about the WY Legislature.
  2. Sassy
    Report Abuse
    Sassy - February 26, 2013 11:49 am
    great more miss managed state land-
  3. Completely Fed Up
    Report Abuse
    Completely Fed Up - February 26, 2013 9:50 am
    As usual, the halfwits in the legislature are tilting at windmills. Anything to please the welfare ranchers. The last thing I want to see is federal lands management turned over to the dimwits in charge of this state ... not to mention the fools who vote for them.
  4. Pops
    Report Abuse
    Pops - February 26, 2013 9:50 am
    Federal lands belong to the United States of America. The people manage the lands and are the conservators and stewards.
  5. stickalose
    Report Abuse
    stickalose - February 26, 2013 9:21 am
    I don't want Wyoming to manage wild horses, it's a money pit. Wolves, chickens, grazing?
    What's the point? Motivation of Gas Hills interests?
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers