Interior Department backs off Blueways river designation in Wyoming

2013-04-09T19:00:00Z 2013-04-09T19:31:24Z Interior Department backs off Blueways river designation in WyomingBy LAURA HANCOCK Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

Wyoming will get a say over whether the Yellowstone River is given a special federal designation, a possibility that drew concern from the state’s congressional delegation, whose members worried the designation could limit the river’s use.

On Tuesday members of the delegation said they felt assured – to an extent – that Wyoming will get a say if the river is designated as part of a National Blueways System.

Sens. Mike Enzi and John Barrasso and Rep. Cynthia Lummis had previously said the National Blueways System was a federal power grab. But in astatement Tuesday, they said that they received a letter from U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar that promised rivers won’t get the federal designation unless states first OK it.

“[Salazar’s] commitment to Wyoming is a positive step,” Barrasso said in a prepared statement, adding that he remains miffed the Blueways program was created by a federal order, which bypassed Congress.

“We plan to hold future Interior Department officials to Secretary Salazar’s criteria,” he said.

According to The Associated Press, Salazar hopes to return to his home state of Colorado as soon as next week if his potential replacement, Sally Jewell, is confirmed.

The members of the all-Republican Wyoming delegation fired off a letter to Salazar about the Blueways program on Feb. 14. They had learned an Interior Department representative visited with the Yellowstone River Conservation District Council, a group composed of a dozen conservation districts in Montana, and said the Yellowstone River could be a candidate for the Blueways designation.

The Yellowstone River flows through Montana and North Dakota, but the headwaters and watershed are in Wyoming.

“If a nominated river and its watershed include land in more than one state, the nomination process will also require a letter of support from states with a significant portion of the watershed within their borders,” Salazar’s letter stated.

According to the federal order that created the Blueways, there would be no new regulations or changes in governmental authority if a river became part of the program.

The program was created to promote conservation and recreation on rivers, “from headwaters to mouth,” according to an Interior Department website.

“What may seem like a harmless federal designation today could have significant impacts down the road on water rights, responsible development and locally-determined conservation efforts,” Lummis said in the statement. “The secretary’s commitment, if honored by his successors, will ensure Wyoming has final say over whether we allow the Blueways designation within our borders.”

Enzi will also hold future Interior Department secretaries to Salazar’s words.

“Wyoming has learned over the years that when the federal government wants to designate something, there are always strings attached,” he said in the statement.

Reach state reporter Laura Hancock at 307-266-0581 or at Follow her on Twitter: @laurahancock.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick