Lummis-supported bills move forward

2013-08-05T06:00:00Z 2013-08-19T20:55:56Z Lummis-supported bills move forwardBy LAURA HANCOCK Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

Rep. Cynthia Lummis supported three bills that successfully passed through the House Natural Resources Committee last week, each of which she said will help the Cowboy State.

Lummis is co-sponsoring two of the bills, which address hydraulic fracturing and national forests, and is the sole sponsor of one bill — for the historical Ranch A in the Wyoming portion of the Black Hills National Forest.

“The House Natural Resources Committee has once again proven itself to be one of the most productive and solution-oriented committees in an otherwise dysfunctional Congress,” Lummis said in a prepared statement.


H.R. 2728, the Protecting States’ Rights to Promote American Energy Security Act, now heads to the House floor.

The bill would prohibit the Bureau of Land Management from regulating hydraulic fracturing in states that already regulate it, such as Wyoming, Lummis said.

The BLM opposes the bill, according to testimony submitted to the committee. In May, the agency released a revised proposed rule on fracking on federal lands and is accepting public comment on the proposal through Aug. 23.

There are 34 states that each have an oil and gas mineral estate, 15 have no fracking regulations, and “the requirements vary considerably across the 19 states that do have regulations of some kind,” the testimony said.

Frances Hunt of the Sierra Club Beyond Natural Gas Campaign said her group and other groups wrote a letter to the committee’s chairman and ranking member in opposition to it. She said the bill is too vague and that federal lands belong to all Americans.

“We believe they deserve strong consistent federal management,” she said. “These states are very inconsistent, and we think inadequate, but certainly inconsistent in their management of oil and gas resources and fracking.”

Gov. Matt Mead, though, believes the federal government should defer to states with established fracking regulations, the governor’s spokesman, Renny MacKay, said. Wyoming was the first state to regulate fracking, through the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission in 2010, MacKay said.

“Wyoming hydraulic fracturing rules are trailblazing,” MacKay said. “And several years ago we took initiative to develop a regulatory path for the emerging issue of hydraulic fracturing, and then years later the federal government comes up with its own. And the proposed federal rule not only has the effect of creating unnecessary and duplicative rules, but it also stifles states’ desire and ability to develop consensus around innovative, state-led regulatory solutions.”


H.R. 1526, the Restoring Healthy Forests for Healthy Communities Act, heads to the House Agriculture Committee, where it has to either be approved or discharged to the House floor, said Christine D’Amico, a spokeswoman for Lummis.

The bill would continue to allow timber projection projects in areas where state and national forests meet. The areas are proposed by state governors, and state foresters’ authority is expanded by giving them “Good Neighbor Authority.” Portions of timber sales would go to rural counties, D’Amico said.

The bill would also temporarily extend the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, which provided income to public schools, according to the bill.

Economies in rural communities have declined because less timber is cut and sold because of lawsuits and regulations. Forests have become unhealthy, susceptible to wildfires and infestation from bugs such as the mountain pine beetle, Lummis said.

The Good Neighbor Authority policy had previously been criticized by the Sierra Club, but the spokesman for the organization’s wing that is fighting it did not return messages to the Star-Tribune.

“We are not talking about clear-cutting forests,” D’Amico said. “We are talking about forest management and harvesting what the Forest Service has already identified as sustained yield in our forests.”

Gov. Mead is reviewing the bill and will monitor its progress in Congress, said MacKay,

his spokesman.

“Gov. Mead also supports extending the Secure Rural Schools funding, which is part of this legislation,” MacKay said in an email. “The extension is needed to ensure communities and schools continue to receive a portion of the revenue generated from National Forests in their backyards.”

Ranch A

H.R. 1684, the Ranch A Consolidation and Management Improvement Act, is headed to the House floor.

The federal government would give 10 acres of Black Hills National Forest property to the state for the historical Ranch A Educational Center. The land would connect parts of the ranch that are currently separate, said John Shoffstall, president of the Ranch A Restoration Foundation, which maintains the ranch as an educational facility.

Currently the Babcock House sits about a mile from the main ranch property, which has three buildings. The bill would unify the ranch, Shoffstall said.

Ranch A is about five miles south of Beulah on Sand Creek Road, he said.

Reach state reporter Laura Hancock at 307-266-0581 or at Follow her on Twitter: @laurahancock.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. side oiler
    Report Abuse
    side oiler - August 05, 2013 10:38 am
    I support a bill to dethrone Lummis (aka Cubin)
  2. Pops
    Report Abuse
    Pops - August 05, 2013 10:00 am
  3. Completely Fed Up
    Report Abuse
    Completely Fed Up - August 05, 2013 9:49 am
    Way to go, Cindy. I see you're still carrying water for corporate and subsidized ag interests, like big energy, big timber, and welfare ranchers, and the environment be damned. How much did you receive in donations for this latest sellout of us commoners? You and the other Cindy are very similar in many respects ...
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses