Mead: Lawmakers followed Wyoming Constitution when they stripped Hill's powers

2013-02-19T21:30:00Z 2013-07-22T19:21:05Z Mead: Lawmakers followed Wyoming Constitution when they stripped Hill's powersBy JOSHUA WOLFSON Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

The Wyoming Legislature acted within the scope of the state constitution when it stripped power away from the superintendent of public instruction last month, attorneys for Gov. Matt Mead argued in a Tuesday court filing.

The document, filed in response to a lawsuit from Superintendent Cindy Hill, maintains the Wyoming Constitution granted legislators the ability to transfer some of her duties to an education director appointed by the governor. Mead’s lawyers further claim the constitution’s framers did not intend for the superintendent to have exclusive authority over the state’s public school system.

“The Wyoming Legislature has altered the powers and duties of the superintendent as explicitly envisioned in the constitution itself,” the filing states. “While it is undeniable that the superintendent’s duties have changed, that is not itself a constitutional violation.”

The state Attorney General’s Office filed the documents exactly three weeks after Hill and two of her supporters sued Mead over a new law that eliminated many of her duties. The law, which sailed through the Legislature last month, removed the superintendent as head of Wyoming Department of Education.

The governor delivered his legal response within hours of his announcement that he had assembled an independent team to investigate a range of issues at the Education Department.

Mead has appointed Jim Rose, the executive director of the Wyoming Community College Commission, to serve as the Education Department’s interim director. Hill, meanwhile, has moved to a new office. She has been left with duties like administering the “teacher of the year” program and helping school districts prevent head injuries.

In the lawsuit, she and her supporters contend the law disenfranchised people who voted for her in the 2010 election. They’ve also argued the law represents a “coup” on a constitutionally created office.

No coup

Mead’s lawyers, however, say the Wyoming Constitution grants the Legislature ultimate responsibility for the state’s education system. They deny lawmakers circumvented the will of the voters by removing many of the superintendent’s power.

“It is worth reiterating that the Wyoming Legislature’s actions are not undemocratic, its actions are not contrary to the will of the people, and it would be the last place to find the perpetrators of a ‘coup,’” Mead’s attorneys state in the filing.

Along with the suit, Hill and two Platte County residents who voted for her in 2010 have asked a judge to grant a preliminary injunction halting implementation of the law. Their attorney argued the law is preventing Hill from carrying out her constitutionally granted responsibilities.

The governor’s attorneys insist there is no need for a preliminary injunction because the changes brought about by the law can be reversed later if the court ultimately rules in Hill’s favor. Hill failed to show that allowing Rose to work for the next few months would cause irreparable harm to herself or her office, they argued.

Mead also disputed claims the law violates the rights of people who cast ballots for Hill. Voters are not entitled to a guarantee that the superintendent’s duties will remain the same, according to his lawyers.

“Such a breathtaking argument, if accepted, would render the legislative power virtually ineffective,” they argued in the filing.

Laramie County District Judge Thomas Campbell has scheduled a March 14 hearing to consider the preliminary injunction request.

The legislation that stripped Hill of much of her power followed a series of disagreements between her and some lawmakers. She has depicted her critics as “good old boys” who were threatened by her efforts to make changes at the Education Department.

Lawmakers have complained that, under Hill’s watch, the department sidestepped the appropriations process when it created a professional development program for teachers. They assigned two auditors to examine how the Education Department was following legislative mandates.

Contact Joshua Wolfson at 307-266-0582 or at Visit to read his blog. Follow him on Twitter @joshwolfson.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(6) Comments

  1. Opie
    Report Abuse
    Opie - February 21, 2013 8:35 am
  2. Wyoite
    Report Abuse
    Wyoite - February 20, 2013 10:31 pm
    Only a lawyer could argue with a straight face that it is unreasonable for the voters to believe that the person who they elected as the Superintendent of Public Instruction would be running the public instruction of Wyoming students.
  3. rigrat
    Report Abuse
    rigrat - February 20, 2013 12:34 pm
    Hill may,or may not,be the cats meow for the job,but these RINO phonies had no business railroading her like they did.This is what's wrong,and has been for a long time,with Wyoming politics...and voters.
  4. LiferRepub1
    Report Abuse
    LiferRepub1 - February 20, 2013 10:12 am
    Enough is enough. How much of our money is Gov. Mead and the legislature going to spend to try to justify their actions? Why does Mead seem to have an endless budget to conduct his witch hunt? If what they did was reasonable and defensible in the first place, then they would not have to keep hiring more auditors and lawyers to defend it.
  5. SimplyAmerican
    Report Abuse
    SimplyAmerican - February 20, 2013 12:29 am
    Especially the ones who are lawyers.

    Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason.
    - Benjamin Franklin
  6. Native9
    Report Abuse
    Native9 - February 19, 2013 10:46 pm
    Tyrants always claim they are acting legally.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers