New fuels tax means more road projects in Wyoming

2014-04-10T09:00:00Z 2015-02-20T18:07:04Z New fuels tax means more road projects in WyomingThe Associated Press The Associated Press
April 10, 2014 9:00 am  • 

Road crews will soon be out in force across Wyoming, and there will be more work going on this year thanks to the state's new 10-cent per gallon fuels tax.

Nineteen of about 140 road projects planned for this fiscal year will be funded by the new tax, Wyoming Department of Transportation spokesman Dave Kingham said. So far, 16 projects worth about $45 million have been contracted out with the new fuels tax money.

"The vast majority of them are pavement milling and overlays," Kingham said. "There's some bridge rehabilitation."

The 2013 Legislature enacted the tax, which took effect last July 1, after the Wyoming Department of Transportation warned that the state's road system was deteriorating faster than crews could repair it because of a lack of money. The tax is expected to raise about $70 million a year, with two-thirds earmarked for maintaining the state highway system.

The Legislature stipulated that the money raised by the new tax for transportation department projects be used to maintain the current highway system. The money can't be used to install a new interchange or build a new highway.

Kingham said the projects funded with the fuels tax this year would not have been done otherwise and the backlog of needed road maintenance would have grown.

"These projects are just ones that have been next up on that list, but we didn't have the money to do before we started getting the increased fuel tax," he said.

The transportation department maintains a list of road- and bridge-maintenance projects that changes year to year as new projects are added and others are addressed and taken off the list. The list had been growing in recent years because of the lack of money has forced the department to delay the road work.

The fuels tax has boosted the number of projects on the list that the department can check off, although the list itself may not be whittled down much because more projects are being added every year under regular maintenance schedules.

"It's sort of a domino effect," Kingham said. "As we've been able to move up these projects into 2014 and move other projects into '15 and '16, which means as you work down the line that will allow us to add new projects."

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. Campbell
    Report Abuse
    Campbell - April 11, 2014 8:37 am
    Fair enough, but how would you have addressed the concerns of freight companies who said they would simply avoid Wyoming to avoid the tolls? I believe Charles Scott supported a failed toll on I-80. Would you have tried to call their bluff? The livelihoods of many in Cheyenne, Laramie, Rawlins, Rock Springs, Green River, and Evanston could be very badly affected by that. If most cars continue to head the hybrid/electric/hydrogen route, wouldn't those surcharges quickly become cumbersome and obsolete?
  2. LVHS77
    Report Abuse
    LVHS77 - April 10, 2014 5:47 pm
    a surcharge of $1,500.00 per year for all electric cars. A $1,000.00 surcharge for hybrids. A toll of $25.00 on all out of state cars entering Wyoming, and a toll on all 18 wheelers passing through the state. Very simple solution. It would not hurt Wyomingites.
  3. Campbell
    Report Abuse
    Campbell - April 10, 2014 1:03 pm
    What would you have proposed instead? (Real question, just curious)
  4. LVHS77
    Report Abuse
    LVHS77 - April 10, 2014 11:57 am
    Gas Tax mead will never get my vote. Neither will anyone who supported the tax.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers