New Wyoming coal mine owner aims to export

Cloud Peak buys Powder River Basin mine site for $300M
2012-07-03T07:00:00Z 2012-08-04T19:02:20Z New Wyoming coal mine owner aims to exportBy JEREMY FUGLEBERG Star-Tribune business editor Casper Star-Tribune Online

With an eye on shipping coal to Asia, a Wyoming-based coal mining company has purchased a new mine site along the Wyoming-Montana border in the Powder River Basin.

Gillette-based Cloud Peak Energy Corp. announced Monday it had closed a $300 million deal for the Youngs Creek site, an area permitted yet undeveloped for coal mining and located 13 miles north of Sheridan.

“The significant coal and surface assets we acquired position Cloud Peak Energy well for future growth in our Asian exports as additional terminal capacity becomes available,” said Colin Marshall, Cloud Peak Energy president and chief executive, in a media release.

The site was purchased from Chevron USA Inc. and Consol Energy Inc. It consists of approximately 60 square miles of land holding 291 million tons of recoverable coal, Cloud Peak said.

The permitted but as-yet undeveloped site is located seven miles from Cloud Peak’s Spring Creek Mine in Montana. The new mine would extend to the border of the Spring Creek Mine to the north, extend into the Crow Indian Reservation in the west and abut the Decker Mine to the east.

Cloud Peak said it had yet to complete a mine development plan for the site.

“Future development timing and production levels are expected to depend largely on the availability of additional export terminal capacity on the West Coast and continued strong Asian demand for thermal coal,” Cloud Peak said in its release.

Cloud Peak has been one of several Powder River Basin coal producers to ship coal via Pacific Coast ports to Asia.

Cloud Peak shipped 4.3 million tons of coal to Asia in 2012 through terminals in Canada and continues to emphasize only a lack of port capacity is blocking a boost in exports.

“While demand from our Asian customers remains strong, this year’s exports will again be limited by available terminal capacity out of the Pacific Northwest,” Cloud Peak said in a quarterly report released April 30.

A number of new export terminals are in the works for Washington and Oregon, despite opposition from some local residents and environmental groups.

Groups, including the Sierra Club, are joining some local residents to argue against coal mining companies’ plans to ship millions more tons of coal to the coast by rail, citing congestion and coal dust pollution concerns.

Reach Jeremy Fugleberg at 307-266-0623 or Read his blog at and follow him on Twitter: @jerenergy.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick