Report flunks Wyoming education policies; officials say it lacks context

2013-01-24T19:30:00Z 2013-01-24T20:38:10Z Report flunks Wyoming education policies; officials say it lacks contextBy ELYSIA CONNER Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

A national education reform group gave a failing grade to Wyoming's efforts to improve education in the state.

State educators said such reports should be viewed in their proper context.

StudentsFirst gave Wyoming an “F” and a ranking of 46th among states. The reform group’s “State Policy Report Card,” graded states' policies on how well they meet its criteria to “elevate teaching,” “empower parents” and “spend wisely and govern well.”

StudentsFirst is a nonprofit organization led by Michelle Rhee, the former chancellor of the Washington, D.C., public school system, according to its website.

The report is about the state’s legislative policies rather than schools, student performance or the Wyoming Department of Education, a WDE press release said.

“This is yet another example of those outside Wyoming who are not familiar with the conscientious work of our legislators who ensure educational policies reflect Wyoming values,” it said.

For an average parent, the critique might be interesting, said John Metcalfe, assistant superintendent of instruction for Fremont County School District 1. But it doesn't tell them much about the authors' experience with a local school or district.

The report says Wyoming should grade schools from A to F based on how well students perform and give parents information about teacher performance.

It also says Wyoming should create more options, such as charter schools and scholarships for private schools, for children trapped in low-performing public schools.

Wyoming also didn’t measure up on elevating teachers. The report said student achievement should play a larger role in educator evaluations, and that currently there are no consequences for being ineffective.

Other failings in this category include not making personnel decisions based on performance, nor rewarding effective educators.

In the spending and governing category, the report criticized Wyoming for leaving decision-making and implementation authority to local school districts. Wyoming should allow for mayoral control of school districts that aren’t doing well, along with state control of low-performing districts and schools, it says. Wyoming received a B in a subcategory for spending taxpayer funds well for not mandating regulations on class sizes past third grade -- a burden which is less beneficial in later grades, it says.

Metcalfe said organizations like StudentsFirst set criteria based on their preferred solutions.

“Then they simply judge the state -- in this case -- relative to their preconceived solutions and how well you’re implementing their solutions,” Metcalfe said.

He thinks some of the report's solutions are common sense, and there is useful information in some subcategories. In other areas, evaluators seem to use a template that doesn’t apply. For instance, private schools don’t exist in many Wyoming communities, yet that figures into the report.

The report said nearly every state has a long way to go to in reforming its policies. More than two-thirds received a D or F. None received an A.

Reach education reporter Elysia Conner at 307-266-0593 or Follow her on Twitter @ElysiaConner

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. DeanWY
    Report Abuse
    DeanWY - January 26, 2013 10:47 am
    You can't teach stupid and then get a high rating any time or any place, so why even try?
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers