Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead will consider trade for Grand Teton land

Gov. Mead will consider trade for Teton land
2013-08-12T18:00:00Z 2013-08-12T19:08:39Z Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead will consider trade for Grand Teton landThe Associated Press The Associated Press
August 12, 2013 6:00 pm  • 

CHEYENNE — Gov. Matt Mead said Monday he hasn’t seen a proposal of what lands the federal government will offer to swap for state holdings in Grand Teton National Park but doesn’t want to wait years to resolve the issue.

Speaking to reporters at a press conference in Sweetwater County, Mead said he talked last week with U.S. Interior Secretary Sally Jewell when she was in Wyoming to tour the state-owned areas within Grand Teton.

The federal government had agreed a few years ago to a four-phase, $107 million purchase of the nearly 1,300 acres of state-owned lands within the park. The federal government already has closed on the first phases, the purchase of minor state mineral rights in early 2012, followed late last year by the purchase of 86 acres of state land for $16 million.

But federal officials now say they don’t have the money to consummate the main transaction: the purchase of two state-owned sections for more than $40 million each.

“It’s clear to me that there is not going to be a cash deal,” Mead said. “The federal government just doesn’t have the money.”

Mead said Jewell assured him that the federal government is committed to acquiring the state parcels but would have to look at trading federal land elsewhere. “Conceptually, I’m open to that,” he said. “But the devil’s in the details.”

Wyoming has owned the land since statehood and state officials long have complained about getting only a pittance every year from ranchers who pay to run cattle in the park. The issue heated up in 2010 when former Gov. Dave Freudenthal threatened to sell the land to the highest bidder, which could lead to unsightly and disruptive development there.

Mead said Monday he has concerns with the prospect of delays in the federal government’s acquisition, but said he’s not to the point where he would say the state’s going to put the parcels on the auction block for the highest bidder.

“I’m not interested in a deal

10 years from now, because I’m not going to be in office, the secretary’s not going to be in office,” Mead said. “And so there’s an immediacy to it that it is still going to be required, even if it’s going to come by way of exchange.”

Jewell issued a statement last week saying she had directed her staff to pursue all options to protect the park. “Given the fiscal climate and constrained federal resources, creativity and flexibility will be required,” she said, “but I am absolutely committed to see this cross the finish line.”

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. Sassy
    Report Abuse
    Sassy - August 13, 2013 9:39 am
    This is not news-- this trade deal has been in the works for several years.. I understand State Parks will likely get a new park out of the deal. I also heard they are considering naming the park the Cliff Hansen Memorial Park ;) Nothing is sacred- everything is for sale....
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick