Wyoming Rep. Wallis expects at least one horse slaughterhouse in the state

2011-12-05T06:00:00Z 2014-01-28T13:24:30Z Wyoming Rep. Wallis expects at least one horse slaughterhouse in the stateBy KELSEY DAYTON Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

LANDER — At least two Wyoming groups are considering opening horse slaughterhouses in the state after Congress passed legislation allowing USDA inspection of horse meat and plants, a proponent says.

State Rep. Sue Wallis, R-Recluse, is a member of the United Horsemen. She said her group formed the company Unified Equine to explore the creation of a horse meat processing plant in Wyoming.

The possibility only opened Nov. 18, when President Barack Obama signed an agriculture spending bill. The bill reversed a 2006 decision by Congress prohibiting U.S. Department of Agriculture inspections for horse meat and plants. The last horse slaughterhouse in the country closed in 2007.

Without the inspections, horse meat couldn’t be transported out of the state, Wallis said. So, technically, slaughterhouses weren’t banned, except in a couple of states that passed laws prohibiting the businesses. But it is impossible to run slaughterhouses without inspections, Wallis said.

Wallis and United Horsemen, as well as other pro-slaughter groups, pushed Congress to allow USDA inspections of horse slaughterhouses.

Wallis said the three-member Wyoming delegation supported allowing such slaughterhouses, especially Rep. Cynthia Lummis.

“Restoring responsible and humane processing is a good step towards dealing with the ever-growing problem of horse overpopulation on private and public lands in Wyoming,” Lummis said in a media release. “More work remains but the lift on the ban is important for the humane management of horses.”

Wild horses weren’t impacted by the current legislation because they are federally protected when on federal land, both Wallis and Wyoming Bureau of Land Management spokeswoman Cindy Wertz said.

“That’s a whole other fight we aren’t fighting today,” Wallis said.

Wallis hopes the federal government will see the success of slaughterhouses in dealing with horses on nonfederal land and eventually consider slaughter as a population management tool for wild horses.

It will take 30 to 90 days, minimum, before any horse slaughter plant could open in the United States because of regulations, Wallis said.

In Wyoming, it will take even longer because there aren’t existing sites that could reopen.

“It’s fairly certain we will not be the first state to have one open,” Wallis said.

Wallis expects Wyoming will eventually have at least one plant. Her group initially looked at the feasibility of building a multipurpose slaughterhouse for cattle, bison and horses, Wallis said. The group tabled those plans, first choosing to work to get the federal government to allow the needed inspections. Now the original plans are in motion.

Wallis said her group is considering a plant in Platte County, an area with a large agriculture base and feedlots. The area also could qualify for rural development funding, Wallis said. And the community, which Wallis and other members of the group have talked with, is supportive because of the economic benefits, she said.

The plant would employ 80 to 100 people with “good-paying jobs with benefits,” she said.

Because of construction and the siting process, it would be at least a year before the plant could open.

“That’s like the best-case scenario,” Wallis said.

At least one other group is also exploring opening a horse slaughterhouse in Wyoming.

Wallis said a group in Riverton contacted her to talk about the possibility of opening a plant. The group’s plans are not yet public and Wallis said they are in the early stages.

Wallis fought hard to allow horse slaughterhouses in the U.S.

“Horses are livestock and always have been,” she said. “Some people consider them pets and that’s fine. But there’s a thriving, world-wide market for horse meat.”

Economically, slaughterhouses help ranchers, who often have a finite amount of resources, Wallis said. When a horse, which is a working animal, is no longer of use, a slaughterhouse allows a rancher to earn some money while also removing the burden of caring for an animal he or she doesn’t need, Wallis said.

“We love our animals, we take care of them, we respect them,” Wallis said. “One of the ways we do that is by making sure their lives are not wasted.”

Slaughterhouses usually bid on horses at auction, Wallis said, looking for a specific number of horses or sizes.

Wallis said horses taken to slaughterhouses are killed humanely, in the same process used for other livestock. Horses are led to a kill box and within seconds are shot once with a bullet or with a penetrating bolt into the brain. Death is instantaneous, Wallis said.

“To many of us, this is a very moral, ethical way to deal with horses you don’t need for something else,” she said.

The meat is then sold.

Much of the rest of the world considers horse just another meat.

In some countries, horse meat is an affordable alternative to beef. In other areas of the world, specific cuts of horse meat can go for $20 a pound and are a delicacy, Wallis said.

Wallis isn’t sure of the potential market for horse meat in the U.S. There are some people who have traveled and eaten horse meat who might buy it, but she believes it will primarily be an export product.

Not everyone in Wyoming is excited about the prospect of killing horses.

“I find it disgusting,” said Patricia Fazio of Cody.

Fazio has a degree in agriculture management and specializes in wild horse issues. She doesn’t consider herself an animal rights activist, but instead an animal welfare activist. She isn’t as radical as many groups, she said.

In fact, she said in a phone interview Thursday that she was preparing to cook a New York strip steak.

“But a horse is not a cow,” she said.

Cattle are bred for consumption. Horses are not, Fazio said.

In the U.S., horses are a symbol of the American West and most often now are used as pets, show animals or for competition, she said.

They aren’t livestock, she said. “They’re a friend. And you don’t eat your buddy.”

Horses, even old ones, can provide companionship, Fazio said, adding that people don’t want to eat their cats and dogs just because they don’t work around the house.

“But they make my heart beat softer and they’re loving companions,” Fazio said. “What’s wrong with companion animals?”

Even ranchers who use horses for work don’t breed them for meat, she said. If a horse is sick, it is medicated and treated, and that contaminates the meat, she said. They aren’t fed with the assumption their diet could one day also be ingested by humans.

Fazio also questions the way horses are killed, worrying the animal might move in fear and if the shot isn’t exact its death might not be instantaneous.

Proponents of slaughterhouses say unwanted horses are turned loose on public land, or abused. Wyoming BLM officials didn’t have numbers on how many horses are abandoned on public land.

Fazio said rescue missions across the country take and care for unwanted horses.

Fazio doesn’t think anyone will actually open a slaughterhouse in Wyoming because the risk of legislation banning inspection could easily return. But if someone does, she’s prepared to fight.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. Ride to End Commercial Horse Slaughter
    Report Abuse
    Ride to End Commercial Horse Slaughter - February 21, 2013 7:00 pm
    Commercial Horse Slaughter is and can never be made humane. The flawed head-shot kill process does not work with horses and the meat produced is tainted with, among other prohibited substance and medication, adrenaline and cortisol in levels much higher than what is found in "dark cutting" beef.

    What really needs to be considered in this issue is the serious risk to human health that is contained in commercially slaughtered horse meat. The levels of adrenaline and cortisol produced by equines are far, far greater than any legal levels found in any other meat harvested for human consumption. Horses are specifically bred for adrenaline production, not for human consumption.

    The fatally flawed head-shot kill method (severe head trauma) used in all commercial horse slaughter ensures that all of the adrenaline and cortisol that can possibly be produced by the animal is delivered throughout the flesh post shot. This is evidenced to any layman by the pulsing of the animal. In commercial beef production they call this “dark cutting” and the meat is not (supposed to be) legally approved for human consumption. Adrenaline and cortisol consumption by humans causes Colorectal and other forms of cancer.

    It is not just the existence of prohibited medications and other man-made substances in the meat that is illegal---it is the abundance of naturally occurring hormones and steroids that make horse meat more carcinogenic than any other commercially slaughtered meat.

    Dr. Lester Friedlander, DVM and former Head Slaughter Inspector/Trainer for the USDA endorses the above statement and also the following, his testimony to U.S. Congress in 2008: http://www.manesandtailsorganization.org/captive_bolt.htm
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. This is a forum for community discussion, and we'd rather address your concerns directly. It would be better to write the editors at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Mandy Burton at 307-266-0545.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't, or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime, or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick