Wyoming students improved on state tests despite problems

Most PAWS scores are better in spite of problems with exams
2010-11-06T01:00:00Z 2011-12-31T16:50:08Z Wyoming students improved on state tests despite problemsBy JACKIE BORCHARDT - Star-Tribune staff writer Casper Star-Tribune Online

Wyoming students scored better on this year's state skills test despite widespread technical problems during the test's administration, according to reports released Friday morning by the state Department of Education.

Proficiency Assessments for Wyoming Students, or PAWS, tests students in third through eighth and 11th grades in math, reading and writing. Students in fourth, eighth and 11th grades are also tested in science. Of the 44,000 students tested in 2010, more than 68 percent scored proficient or advanced in all subjects. Seventy-two percent of students tested proficient or better in math, 64 percent in reading and 78 percent in writing.

More students scored proficient and advanced in writing than in 2009 in every grade -- 35 percent more in fourth grade -- according to state PAWS results. The spike in writing proficiency was caused in part by changes to the skills graded and the number of points needed to meet state standards, state officials said.

Results were delayed three months while analysis could be done on the validity of the test's administration, which was plagued with technical problems. An independent, third-party analysis determined technical problems did not affect student performance, but officials say school districts should use the data carefully and cautiously.

Writing boost

Major gains in writing on last year's state skills test are due in part to changes in how the tests were scored.

About 60 teachers discussed the test's standards and how students should be measured. Previously, the writing test was scored in six skill areas: idea development, organization, voice, conventions, word choice and sentence fluency.

The last two skills were folded into the first four, which changed how writing tests were scored. Points awarded changed from a maximum of four points to a maximum of three points per skill, lowering the maximum number of points from 48 to 24.

Scoring changes weren't the only reason or the main reason scores increased, said Jim McBride, superintendent of public instruction.

"The real story is what's going on in the classrooms with the teachers," McBride said. "We've had a statewide emphasis on improving writing."

But the scores can't be compared to those from past years, said Mike Flicek, director of assessment and research for the Natrona County School District.

Re-evaluating the standards, more students were determined to be meeting them, Flicek said. What's more important is how much the district grew beyond the state average.

Federal guidelines

The state has received verbal confirmation that schools will be exempt from adequate yearly progress, or AYP, from the U.S. Department of Education, McBride said.

AYP is the mark schools must meet to prove students have learned skills. Elementary and middle schools will carry over their AYP status from 2009. High school AYP will be determined from 2009 PAWS scores and the most recent graduation rate.

Holding AYP for a year means schools that made significant progress in 2010 won't be recognized. It also means 10th-grade scores won't roll over and all high school juniors will have to take PAWS next year.

McBride said 30 districts requested the waiver and it wouldn't be fair to punish a school or district that experienced excessive problems.

"We can't go back and undo that now," McBride said. "And I don't know I would if I could, because I don't want to hurt even one individual student."

While more students scored proficient or better, more students also scored basic or below basic on half of the tests. Students whose first language isn't English scored the lowest, with at least half scoring below proficient on every test except eighth-grade writing.

Asked about more students scoring below proficient in a dozen areas, McBride said technical problems could have factored into those scores.

"We're not sure that data is valid and reliable," McBride said.

McBride thinks scores will improve across the board in 2011 because tests will be administered on paper with pencil.

Reach education reporter Jackie Borchardt at (307) 266-0593 or at jackie.borchardt@trib.com. Read her education blog at trib.com/reportcard and follow her on Twitter @JMBorchardt

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers