CHEYENNE — Attorneys argued before the Wyoming Supreme Court on Thursday over whether Gov. Matt Mead’s administration properly withheld from an environmentalist state records concerning federal endangered-species protections for grizzly bears.

The state denied the records on the grounds they are exempted under “deliberative-process” privilege. Such privilege would shield records of discussions and deliberations that lead up to decisions by state officials from release under Wyoming’s public-records law.

Bruce Moats, an attorney for environmentalist Robert Aland, argued that the state law doesn’t recognize deliberative-process privilege. An attorney for the state, Ryan Schelhaas, countered that it is permissible based on legislators’ intent when they passed the law in 1969.

State officials need to have the “freedom to think out loud, and test out ideas prior to making decisions” without having those talks known to the public, Schelhaas told the justices.

That serves the public’s interest by leading to better government, he argued.

The high court took the arguments under advisement and will rule in writing later.

Aland seeks records supporting Mead’s assertion that the greater Yellowstone grizzly population is healthy enough so that it no longer needs federal Endangered Species Act protections. Mead made the claim in a 2012 letter to then-Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.

Aland, a tax attorney, received 175 documents from the state. Mead and Game and Wyoming Fish Department Director Scott Talbott withheld 42 other documents.

Moats argued that state lawmakers in 2012 considered adding deliberative-process privilege to the state’s public records law but ultimately didn’t. They wouldn’t have done that, he said, if the privilege already had existed in the law.

There’s no real evidence to support the claim that having government operate in a “fishbowl,” or transparently, impedes good decision-making, he said.

“This idea that an adviser would not give their best advice to a decision-maker, and therefore would withhold their best advice, is questionable,” Moats said.

Moats also argued that because state policy already supported delisting grizzly bears, no documents related to delisting grizzlies could be considered “pre-decisional” and therefore withheld under the deliberative-process privilege — even if such privilege existed.

The federal Freedom of Information Act recognizes deliberative-process privilege. Wyoming lawmakers were aware of that when they modeled the state’s open records law closely on the federal law 45 years ago, Schelhaas argued.

“The executive branch is not a town hall meeting. It is not intended to get the public involved in every decision, as with boards and commissions,” he said.

The state Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that deliberative-process privilege did not apply to draft state budget documents denied to the Wyoming Tribune Eagle newspaper. The justices wrote that if legislators wanted to incorporate deliberative-process privilege into state law, they would go ahead and do so.

Reach Jeremy Fugleberg at 307-266-0623 or Follow him on Twitter: @jayfug.

(2) comments


Tax free donations for enviros must be dropping off, if they have to try to fund raise via a lawsuit over something like this. I don't understand how they ever got the power to regularly pick the taxpayer pockets for more and more money and increase their power in the process.

Cowboy Joe

This case should be framed more from the "open records/right of citizens to know what elected officials are doing" perspective---government should only be able to keep VERY limited secrets and only as the apply to national security. Sunshine laws, FOIA, public records should be visible to whatever citizen would like to look at them, otherwise our government become fertile grounds for abuse and corruption.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.