Wyoming Supreme Court OKs phone approvals for DUI testing

2013-10-04T22:00:00Z 2014-02-21T20:45:15Z Wyoming Supreme Court OKs phone approvals for DUI testingThe Associated Press The Associated Press
October 04, 2013 10:00 pm  • 

CHEYENNE — A 2011 Wyoming law that allows judges to grant requests from police over the telephone for warrants to force motorists to submit to DUI testing passes constitutional muster, the state Supreme Court ruled Friday.

The ruling came in response to a challenge from two Teton County motorists. The ruling means that their cases may now proceed in the court system.

Lawyers for motorists Dena T. Blomquist and Terry Smith had argued before the Supreme Court in April that evidence of their clients' blood-alcohol levels should be suppressed. The lawyers said telephonically approved warrants didn't meet the constitutional requirements.

Lawyers for the Wyoming Attorney General's Office counted that the telephonic warrants were just as valid as ones with written police affidavits because the conversation between the officer and the judge was recorded and officers provided sworn testimony over the telephone.

State Rep. Keith Gingery, R-Jackson, drafted the new law. He's also a lawyer with the Teton County Attorney's Office, which is prosecuting the motorists.

"We passed that two years ago in order to combat drunk driving, and it's been a very effective tool," Gingery said Friday.

Gingery said the law respected constitutional protections while acknowledging technological advancements.

"I think it's very positive, both for protection of personal liberties, which we will continue to do, but also as a tool for fighting against drunk driving," Gingery said.

Gingery said he intended the law to target repeat DUI offenders. Before the law went into effect, he said many of them routinely refused to consent to tests knowing it was difficult to get a judge to sign off on warrants in person.

"It's really those multiple DUI drivers that are really dangerous," Gingery said. He said he knew there would be challenges to the law.

"The court has clearly found the law to be constitutional, so I think we can move forward now with confidence," Gingery said.

Stephen E. Weichman, Teton County attorney, declined comment on the ruling on Friday, saying the prosecutions against the motorists are still pending.

Jackson lawyer Richard D. Stout, representing Blomquist, also declined comment on Friday. Stout said he couldn't talk about the ruling while the criminal case against his client is pending.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. strool35
    Report Abuse
    strool35 - February 23, 2014 7:24 am
    It is sicking the way some so called reps want to make a law for every thing that does nothing but cost money. Any politician coming out of Jackson is about like a left wing democrat, pass a law whether it is needed or not. There are some that will vote for any thing as long as it is a feel good law or a tax increase and there are the same bunch that will vote for those every time, brain dead.
  2. griz
    Report Abuse
    griz - October 05, 2013 7:27 am
    A victory against those who endanger us for their right to party. Kudos to the court.
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses