Diverse ozone task force was up to the challenge

2012-10-08T00:00:00Z Diverse ozone task force was up to the challengeStar-Tribune Editorial Board Casper Star-Tribune Online
October 08, 2012 12:00 am  • 

No one who participated in the eight-month effort to find ways to reduce air pollution in the Pinedale area was likely satisfied with all of the recommendations.

But that’s the nature of collaborative solutions. The 26 members of the task force represented many diverse interests, including the oil and gas industry, county and city government officials, the governor’s office, the U.S. Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, environmental groups and local citizens.

At the end of the process, the Upper Green River Basin Air Quality Citizens Advisory Task Force developed many ideas that the Wyoming DEQ should give serious consideration.

The willingness of the task force members to sit in the same room and hammer out a set of recommendations over the course of six public meetings should be praised by all of Wyoming. It’s an excellent example of how some environmental problems can be attacked head-on without automatically resorting to litigation or heavy-handed regulation.

Instead of being tied up in court for years, there’s now a good chance that most of the group’s advice can be implemented by state regulators working with industry and concerned citizens.

As a show of the effort’s success, we point to two endorsements by members who started with very different agendas.

Bruce Pendery, program director of the Wyoming Outdoor Council, said while some provisions could have been stronger, the fact that such disparate interest groups and individuals “were able to reach consensus recommendations is somewhat remarkable.”

He noted that industry representatives supported overall strong protections for air quality, which Pendery called a “significant” step.

Craig Brown, a senior engineer for QEP Resources, an active producer in the Pinedale area, told Star-Tribune energy reporter Adam Voge that the task force “made significant progress” in addressing wintertime ozone levels in the basin.

Levels of ozone, also called smog, have been especially high in recent winters, driven in large part by emissions from natural gas and oil drilling in the Pinedale Anticline and Jonah fields. Temperature inversions — when cold air is trapped by warm air from above — can trap volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxide in the valley.

Because ozone is widely known to cause a host of respiratory problems, Pendery said the levels in the Upper Green River Basin must be reduced to protect the public’s health. On several occasions, residents in the Pinedale area have been advised by the Environmental Protection Agency not to go outside because of the high ozone levels.

The task force asked the DEQ to control air pollution from existing oil and gas stationary sources, including currently unregulated oil and gas industry air pollution sources.

The recommendations call for the reduction of nitrogen oxide air pollution — a key component in ozone formation — from all drilling rigs and completion/hydraulic fracturing operations. Leak detection and repair standards should also be developed, the task force said.

The report said ozone monitoring, inventory and air quality modeling should be improved, with the information made available to the public. The group recommended that some of the provisions be accompanied by a phase-in period, with incentives offered to accelerate emissions reductions.

Industry already has a good incentive to reduce ozone levels, since its non-attainment of national ozone standards has resulted in the EPA giving the oil and gas industry until the end of 2015 to come back into compliance. If it doesn’t, even more severe pollution controls could be required under the Clean Air Act.

It would be much better for everyone in the Pinedale area for the DEQ to adopt the task force’s reasonable recommendations to reduce ozone instead of relying on a federal agency to enforce stricter pollution controls. This is a problem diverse Wyoming interests came together to work out, and they were up to the task.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. carlover
    Report Abuse
    carlover - October 08, 2012 7:14 am
    whoo hoo 6 public meetings, but i did not see where the public fit into the list of adendees.
    dont you just love that word consenses? so what was the list people had to choose from?
    you know the list that is prodesigned to bring everyone to the preterdermined outcome?
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editors@trib.com, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Activate subscription button gif
Loading…

Poll: What's your favorite Wyoming brewery?

View Results

Featured Businesses

Latest Offers