University of Wyoming President Bob Sternberg’s recent entry into the debate over how to handle K-12 gifted and talented students was important for two reasons.

First, the fact that the university president is concerned that younger students not in his institution — and not just gifted and talented students — are welcome at a time when there is some disconnect between the K-12 schools and colleges.

Sternberg’s willingness to comment on a primary education issue is important if we are to send high school graduates to college well prepared. It’s not easy to remember another time when a university president jumped eagerly into discussions about how to educate the young students who will one day be his responsibility.

There is turf in education, as in many institutions.

But education is one place where keeping policy planning in silos is especially dangerous.

And it’s unfair to the students who have good high school grades but soon find that in fact they are not prepared for college. It’s a fact for too many of Wyoming’s high school graduates.

As the president of the Wyoming Community College Commission Jim Rose warned recently, one-third of merit scholars in the Hathaway Scholarship Program need remedial work when they enter college.

And they are the successes in high school.

These remedial issues are not limited to Wyoming. A 2008 study by the nonprofit Strong American Schools found that nearly four out of five remedial students had a high school GPA of 3.0 or higher.

So at a time when educators up and down the K-12 system are discussing how to graduate students, who then later need remedial help in college, participation from the university president is welcome and needed.

And if anyone were to ask, “What does the university president know about testing first-graders?” here is the answer.

Understanding different types of “giftedness” has been Sternberg’s career-long subject of study. At Tufts University, Sternberg was the director of the Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise Center, specializing in evaluating different ways of learning and being successful.

As Sternberg summed it up in a column written for the Star-Tribune, “The risk of relying too heavily on a standardized test is that one will identify children who are gifted, but especially at taking standardized tests.”

He was responding to a Star-Tribune report on the varying and inconsistent ways school districts in Wyoming evaluate children for gifted and talented programs by pointing out: “Standardized tests are fairly narrow in the range of skills they assess (usually, knowledge and analytical reasoning with that knowledge), whereas giftedness comes in many and diverse forms.

“Students can be gifted scientists, mathematicians, writers, artists, or musicians, among other things. They can be analytically gifted, or creatively or practically gifted.”

Sternberg said in a Star-Tribune interview that sometimes the worst-performing college students are those with high test scores but average grades in high school.

We hope that looking beyond the test scores to students who have the qualities of success will be contagious, and perhaps influence the rigid standards for awarding Hathaway Scholarships. High school students with a focus on one area, such as music or arts, find that their achievements do not count toward the Hathaway Scholarship Program. And one of the program’s major requirements is high ACT scores.

We endorse Sternberg’s comments as a step toward a coordinated effort that effectively evaluates children and then prepares them to succeed in college and in whatever course they follow.

(3) comments


Hopefully the UW President will look at what is being taught and tested for and have the courage to stand up and say this if the students learn this they will at the very least be prepared for college. We also need to remember that not all students will go to college and they need to be prepared to do the jobs they chose. Lets not get to focused on college. The President alss needs to evaluate if their circulum is really preparing their students for a job in the real world or if it is all theory and no substance.

The only problem with your reasoning is that all parents of all high school students think their child is going to college. It only takes one look at vocational programs and their enrollments to realize we are throwing money at a dead horse. If students learn to read, write, and do math, they will be prepared for whatever they choose to do when they graduate. I do not know of any job or vocation that does not require one of the skills of reading, writing or math. The new CAPS Center that the district forced down people's throats will do nothing for students. In three or four years it will be like Frontier Middle School.


How many educators dialogue? Monologue is the one sided communication style they are most comfortable with.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.