The tone-deaf listening tour

2013-11-07T05:00:00Z The tone-deaf listening tourSTAR TRIBUNE EDITORIAL BOARD Casper Star-Tribune Online
November 07, 2013 5:00 am  • 

The Environmental Protection Agency is conducting a “Listening Tour” on tougher coal plant standards but seems to be wearing earmuffs.

The EPA is working on new limits for existing coal-fired power plants in an effort to reduce carbon emissions. Its website describes the goal of the tour this way: “The feedback from these 11 public listening sessions will play an important role in helping EPA develop smart, cost-effective guidelines.”

Feedback sounds like a good idea when you are planning to overhaul how a major industry does business. But wouldn’t you want to know what they think in the states that produce and consume coal?

How do you gather a complete range of comments when the tour manages to avoid the top three coal-producing states of Wyoming, West Virginia and Kentucky? The tour that continues until Friday included stops in NewYork, Boston, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, San Francisco, Seattle and Lenoxa, Kan.

This isn’t only a Wyoming complaint. The EPA bypasses 16 of the top 20 coal-producing states.

Whatever a person’s view about the desirability of setting deadlines for reducing carbon pollution, there’s no denying that the people who will enact the changes are the ones who produce coal now.

Wyoming senators Mike Enzi and John Barrasso joined other senators in challenging the logic of this tour, which ignores our state, producer of 40 percent of the U.S. coal in 2011.

On Oct. 31, they wrote to Gina McCarthy, administrator of the EPA, to ask the agency to “consider hearing the opinions of the people most impacted by your policies.”

They worry that new rules could force layoffs or plant closures that would do major economic harm to one of Wyoming’s most important industries.

A look at what is cost-effective would need to account for its price to the economy to be complete.

And then there’s the issue of hearing from the people who use coal, the ones most affected by changes that will cost money to the producers and likely higher prices for consumers. The 11 selected locations for the “Listening Tour” don’t include most of the states that largely use coal for power.

A letter of protest from state and business groups accused the EPA of not following its own guidelines to hold hearings in geographic areas effected by policies. These writers pointed out that the tour started out in San Francisco, which receives 1 percent of its energy from coal-fired plants, but did not go to West Virginia, where 96 percent of electricity comes from coal.

“EPA has chosen to locate most of these hearings in states and regions that use very little coal, while neglecting states most dependent on coal for affordable and reliable electricity generation,” said the letter.

Why would you only include four of the top coal-consuming states in your tour to evaluate effects from the changes? They will pay the new prices that come with regulations.

While our Republican senators have challenged the EPA plan, this concern isn’t limited to one party. Democratic Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), whose first job after law school was working for the EPA, wrote to McCarthy to “strongly disagree with your decision to limit these sessions … ignoring many of the very states that are most dependent on coal production and coal-fired power.”

The tour started Oct. 23 and ends Friday, never having set foot in Heitkamp’s state, or neighboring Montana and Wyoming — states that produced 63 percent of the country’s coal in 2011.

There’s a phrase for that kind of “listening tour” — tone-deaf.

Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. Wyominer
    Report Abuse
    Wyominer - November 08, 2013 12:01 am
    Let me start off by saying that i agree with Cody on the China issue. To me this "attack on coal" is needless. The people of this earth share the same air. China is by far the the biggest issue here. The government has decided to ignore the issues with other countries emissions, and try to strictly limit our countries. In turn this will cause many in these coal producing states to lose thier jobs. That is exactly why i feel that this is an attack on coal, an attack on coal miners, and an attack on me. Wyoming has a plan to meet these emission regulations over a certain period of time. The EPA wants it done now. The people that are backing the EPA on this issue are glad to use the power that is supplied to them via coal plants, but at the same time want to shut them down. I just don't get it. Support what supports you.
  2. jc45
    Report Abuse
    jc45 - November 07, 2013 2:10 pm
    It is ironic that the clean air laws that were passed in the 70’s and enforced by the EPA are what spurred the boom in coal in the PRB. When the laws were passed to cut down on the amount of sulfur emissions, the lower sulfur and lower heating value coal in the PRB gained popularity. Now the coal companies that benefited from those laws do not want many of the laws enforced.
  3. D2LnB
    Report Abuse
    D2LnB - November 07, 2013 1:53 pm
    It should be noted that the EPA session in Denver had a toll-free call in to give 3 minute testimony from 3-5 pm on the day of the listening session. The coal industry apparently had no problem getting people to Denver to testify as I witnessed folks from as far away as Minnesota and North Dakota in attendance - plenty from Wyoming. Let's also face the reality that EPA's budget is not what it used to be, thanks to Big Coal's friends in Congress who continually take their shots at the agency.
  4. Cody Coyote
    Report Abuse
    Cody Coyote - November 07, 2013 10:13 am
    It appears that King Coal is bankrolling the Casper Star these days. What does it cost to buy 30 column inches of Propaganda ?

    I presume their largesse does not extend to buying hearing aids for the Editor and Publisher and whomever writes this pro-industry scrip. There seems to be a lot of tone deafness regarding coal and its consequences.

    Checked the Air Quality reports from inland China cities lately ?
Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick