Hospital's response inadequate

2012-03-16T00:00:00Z 2012-03-22T20:20:19Z Hospital's response inadequate Casper Star-Tribune Online
March 16, 2012 12:00 am


Regarding the March 14 CS-T article, "Report shows Sheridan hospital failed to sterilize equipment last year," by Joan Barron.

Claims by Sheridan Memorial Hospital and the Wyoming Department of Health that there have been no infections or complications reported in relation to the hospital's failure to adequately sterilize the laryngeal airway masks (LMAs) between surgical patient uses is ludicrous for two reasons.

First, because the hospital did not notify affected surgical patients of their exposure to inadequately sterilized devices, patients experiencing any infections or complications would not have attributed such events to the exposure since they were unaware that inadequately sterilized LMAs had been used.

Second, certain infections may be asymptomatic and, without appropriate screening, may have gone undetected so far.

Therefore, as we stated in our letter to the health department, the agency should immediately require that the hospital implement a plan to (a) notify each patient who was exposed to the inadequately sterilized LMAs between May and November 2011 about the risks of this exposure, (b) offer them screening for potential infections that may have resulted from such exposure, and (c) treat any patients found to have been infected.

The hospital's press release, which states that "any patients who may have had surgery between May and November of 2011 and might have questions or concerns can contact the hospital" falls far short of what is needed. It is highly unlikely that the affected surgical patients will see this press release, and if they did, they would still be unaware that their surgeries involved the use of inadequately sterilized LMAs.


MICHAEL A. CAROME, M.D., Washington, D.C.

Deputy Director, Health Research Group, Public Citizen



Copyright 2015 Casper Star-Tribune Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Untitled Document

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps...

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

  5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Jason Adrians at 266-0545 or Content Director David Mayberry at 266-0633. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

  6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

  7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

  8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick