Three years ago, when the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a flawed “waters of the U.S.” rule, I was wondering what this meant for our family ranch. Apparently, I had a lot of company. I don’t think there was a farmer or rancher in the West who could tell which ditches, gullies and low spots on our farms were suddenly regulated as “waters of the U.S.” We didn’t know if we would suddenly need permits and permission for the routine farming practices that we had been using for years on our land. Practices, including irrigating or pasture regeneration, that are beneficial to the ranch and the land.

As a Wyoming rancher, there are many things that I cannot control, like a late spring blizzard, drought or grasshopper plague. But we try to understand and plan ahead for government regulations. So, we started to look for answers on what the 2015 WOTUS rule really meant, and all we found was more confusion. Thankfully, the confusing 2015 rule was never fully implemented nationwide, as it was blocked by the courts within days of its effective date.

So I was excited when last week, the EPA proposed a new clean water rule to replace the flawed 2015 WOTUS rule. There are always details to sort out — and there may be room for improvement on the latest proposal, but at first look, there’s no question that this is good news for farmers and ranchers who have faced confusion and unclear rules like we have.

One of the best things that the new proposed Clean Water Rule provides is clarity. Clear rules will be more effective at protecting water and provide us with more honest, transparent government. This clarity helps ranchers know how “waters of the U.S.” are defined and protected. A rancher needs to be able to look across his or her ranch and be able to tell what is and isn’t a federally regulated waterbody. We shouldn’t have to hire a team of lawyers, environmental engineers and consultants to help us guess whether we can farm and ranch on our land.

For our family, the ranch isn’t just our family business, it’s where my husband and I live and raise our two daughters and two sons, where Grandpa and Grandma’s house is just a short walk away because they work and live here, too. As a Wyoming Centennial Ranch, we make decisions with the future always in mind and our hope is that our kids will continue on here after us. And this isn’t unique to our place; most farms and ranches across the state are family-owned outfits like ours. We make conservation a priority and we really care about clean water and want to protect our natural resources for future generations.

There’s a lot at stake here: protecting water quality, producing safe and affordable food and preserving a strong economy and the hundreds of thousands of farming- and ranching-related jobs that our communities depend on. It’s worth the time that the EPA and Engineer Corps have taken over the last two years to get this right. Thankfully, the proposed new rule provides more clarity so ranchers like me can do the right thing: comply with the law, protect the environment and grow the crops that feed our people and our economy. That’s why I support clear rules for clean water.

Subscribe to Daily Headlines

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Rachel Grant is a wife, mother and rancher in Converse County. She is passionate about natural resources, conservation and ranching and how they work together. Grant also believes in volunteering to make a difference. She currently serves as state chair of the Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation Natural and Environmental Resources Committee and is president of the Converse County Farm Bureau Federation.


Load comments