Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
spotlight AP

The Utterly Moderate podcast: Understanding Recent Climate Change News (with James Gerber)

  • 0

In America, we talk so much about freedom as it is a central part of our identity.

When it comes to what freedom entails, most Americans would agree that there are political, social, and economic dimensions. Most agree that in a free society there is a need for order, justice, security, opportunity, and fairness. There is a shared sense that freedom requires the absence of harm and undue interference. Most believe that freedom requires a variety of rights, including those related to speech, property, voting, religion, fair legal treatment, assembly, the press, and so on.  

One important thing to remember in these conversations is not just to focus on being free from something, but free to do something as well. Being free from tyranny does not necessarily mean the conditions exist which allow you to live a full life. That freedom requires not merely the absence of something but the presence of something as well.

Climate change might be seen as a threat to the freedom and well-being of not only all Americans living today, but for their children and grandchildren, since greenhouse gas emissions can be locked into the atmosphere for generations.

The sooner we act, the less damage there will be to our society and to Earth’s ecosystems and the lower the economic cost.

There has been a lot about climate change in the news lately, with the release of the recent IPCC assessment and COP26 in Glasgow.

To help us understand this, Dr. James Gerber joins the Utterly Moderate Podcast.

Gerber is the co-director and lead scientist of the Global Landscapes Initiative (GLI) at the Institute on the Environment at the University of Minnesota.

After listening to this episode, make sure to explore climate solutions at Project Drawdown or climate research at the AAAS.

You can subscribe to this podcast at Apple PodcastsGoogle Podcasts and Spotify.

Two reasonable social scientists, Dr. Alison Dagnes and Dr. Lawrence Eppard, analyze important topics by clearing away politics, opinions, and ideologies to get to the facts.

0 Comments
0
0
0
0
0

Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Stubson writes: This past weekend the Wyoming GOP held its quarterly State Central Committee meeting, the outcome of which was a flurry of asinine resolutions best characterized as clubby playground tattling. The Central Committee’s actions also thrust my party into the national dialogue as the latest example of political party dysfunction.

Hunkins writes: It wasn’t far into my routine before I forgot breakfast and sat down to listen and watch Lamb’s fascinating interview with a newly elected representative to the Virginia House of Delegates, a young, articulate and conservative Black woman from Norfolk, Virginia.

Barron writes: 

The ballot item failed by only 116 votes in an election where voters passed every thing else including $10 million for a new senior center. The total approved menu called for spending $128 million for 13 propositions and more than 60 projects.

Adler writes: The Court cut the ground from beneath its landmark ruling with a wounding declaration that the president enjoys a “limited” executive privilege: “The privilege is fundamental to the operation of Government and inextricably rooted in the separation of powers under the Constitution.”

Rudkin writes: 

I can’t help but make the connection between this place and what God does in the hearts and minds of those who choose to trust him. God has always been in the business of restoring, taking hearts that are bone tired, skeptical, broken down by the cares of this life and breathing beauty into them again.

What a seismic difference a trial has made to public and media perceptions of Kyle Rittenhouse. When he was charged at age 17 with shooting three men, two fatally, during racial unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last year, various media accounts described him as a rifle-toting white supremacist who drove across the border to shoot Black Lives Matters protesters in the racial unrest that followed ...

The Washington, D.C.-based Federal Bureau of Investigation has lost all credibility as a disinterested investigatory agency. Now we learn from…

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News